Phil_in_here

joined 3 years ago
[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 90 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If there's no Mom, what's stopping you from pooping your pants?

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

Oh, I thought it was saying shfuckting

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

100% agree. We shouldn't let the billionaire class of well documented child rapists exist in the West

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Turns out...

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its a fucking embarrassment to have private prisons.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Doing a good job dismantling public education, so they're right on track.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Stay inside and avoid their territory?

Absolutely fucking not. This is our planet, not theirs. Billionaires are an invasive species.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I mean, Trump's war of choice in Iran was an unmitigated disaster. I can't imagine how poorly they would respond to domestic guerrilla warfare

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And people believe it!

"Why should I pay for someone who cannot work to live?"

"Why should I pay for water to be clean that I may never drink, or air I may never breathe?"

The corporate brainwashing is staggering.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 100 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Why would I pay the government to collect a pool of money to pay for other people's medical needs?

Much better to pay a private company to collect a pool of money, skim a bunch for profit, invest the rest for more profit, conspire to make healthcare prices unaffordable to users so they don't have a choice anyway, and then use that money only to pay for some of the other people's medical needs while denying healthcare for the rest, including myself? It's a much better system. Here's a link to an article funded by a US pharmaceutical company...

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I didn't find the nurses figures on the link. Within 10% is similar for doctors, but 300% of the nurses is a big difference for sure.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Not to mention a family of 4, which would amount to $4000, which might be a 10% increase in income, not including the 30% that's already been taxed out of that $300b.

view more: next ›