Redjard

joined 2 years ago
[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 6 points 1 hour ago
try {
    anal();
} catch (HIV) {
    loop {
        sleep(1000000000);
        if HIV.has_cure {break}
    }
}
[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 1 hour ago

I interpret this as the "boundary" being one-way away from us, with us at the "top of the potential well". As opposed to the more commonly proposed idea that the universe is inside a black hole.

Hawking radiation is based on the curvature of the event horizon, so in this case I think it should balance negatively, sucking out energy from the universe, probably by releasing negative energy particles in the particle perspective.

This doesn't make physical sense, which matches that such an event horizon shape also doesn't make sense and shouldn't be able to be created I think.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 1 points 2 hours ago

*eats peanuts*

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Hoping for the internet to die so you can live in real life where people are not cringe

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I see. That does seem far fetched though, and really only holds any plausability once your ID doesn't match your own claim.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 6 points 13 hours ago

This is because rape implies a crime on a lower class human, while murder assumes you didn't get away with it by default so you must have killed a rich conservative white man.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 46 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

It's also completely fine under all international law.
Following copyright law is more like a trade agreement, so if you feel wronged enough as a nation it's completely uncontroversial to suspend all or all international copyright law and deal with the consequences (mainly the us being very salty about it).

The EU contingency for a US attack on Greenland for example is among other steps to suspend all US copyrights recognition and starve the US service industry.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago

Did she even say thank you?

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Yeah but then if they pass your id and agree to the bribery they'll give you the 100$? It's the wrong way around to be bribery.

Bribery needs pass and pay, this is pass or pay. The incentive for the storekeeper is to not sell to you and get the money.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I was already in the middle of posting this to !dontyouknowwhoiam@lemmy.world before seeing the remainder of your post :)

 

I think the rules require me to censor the one-who-was-not-known too.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stimmt, da wäre es. Bringt uns dann aber wieder zur ursprünglichen Thematik

und vorher aus dem Zug auszusteigen, um nur einen Teil der Strecke zu fahren.

Das hier scheint dann weiter völlig haltlos dazustehen.

PS: Siehst du bei der DB eine ähnliche Klausel, oder steht da wirklich nichts?

view more: next ›