Why the downvotes ?. Is it because the red army is not shown as redfash army???
Very original thought.
Snark is a valid kind of response to trolls, even to well intentioned naive libs. Even when we can see some open minded libs showing gratitude to some of our comrades who patiently explaining things to them. This good cop bad cop tatics is much more useful than being overtly nice. They have to understand that liberal ideology is not the norm nor natural, it is something that will be protested and push backed. Only then the cool headed explanation will penetrate. Some might be put of by the first step, but the first step is necessary to shaken their perspective and filter out the trolls.
Neo or normal lib, their criticism of us is that we have strong beliefs and we can actually do things. According them, this is what fascists do. Stronger the beliefs and the more things we actually accomplish, more fascist we become.
This is what I hate about CTH. In the end sarcasm is dead, now it is not that far fetched opinion to witness even in lemmy.
Libs got wikipedia and we got prolewiki. .
Just like libs trying to show that Dessalines is a tankie through OSINT. Libs are mostly illiterate, if they ever click through links and read something, it becomes extensive research.
Reactionaries not learning is not due to lack of simpler explanations, it is due to not seeing any material benefit in changing themselves.
No one mentioned our second habibi, HasanAbi🤤. What Iam seeing is more like stochastic forms of learning among people which lackes centre public figures. I do not think this is bad but moving forward figures who can put theory in to practice should emerge and it will.
I guess your bar for good fucking content is too low.
There is a pattern I have seen in Tom Scott videos, he only makes videos about the "international community" countries.