Thanks I appreciate it! It looks pristine since it’s newly installed this year. It’s already settling in nicely.

I prefer wood myself, but health and costs can get in the way sometimes, this was easier, but I don’t hate the result at all.

I never changed my argument, yes as owner/producer he’s responsible for anything/anyone on site. That’s what being a producer/owner means, you’re liable for any action your company does or doesn’t do… the states seem to allow multiple ways to separate yourself.

and made it sound like the US system is worse for not holding him responsible,

Uhh… it is, but you also started. Topic that’s entirely different to the article anyways.

but now it's if he was "directly" in charge of her supervision and didn't stop her from doing something unsafe,

No, that was the point the entire time, but you are off on a topic unrelated to the article apparantly.

fe, which IS how it works in the US as well, so what have you been complaining about this entire time?

That’s not how it works in the states, like at all… it would be a civil trial, not criminal, wholefully different things. And if it was actually how it worked, he probably wouldn’t get off on a technicality like this…. Can you provide a situation where this has happened in the states? I can provide multiple myself for my country.

You even said in a previous comment it would be an uphill battle.. that means there’s not laws and there no precedence, so how can you claim the US in the same? What about all the other people saying the US is different? You seem to be the only one saying the US has these laws, yet you also say how it doesn’t in your additional comment information. So which is it…?

Where did I say they wouldn’t be responsible…?

It doesn’t fall on someone else, the person who fucked up is still culpable, it’s just the people that hired them and directed their work ( you can’t be liable if you don’t direct their work it’s how the chain works) can be held liable too.

You can disagree all you want, but why would your boss who directs you not be liable for what they get you to do….? That’s an absolutely asinine take. Your boss tells you to do something unsafe and they just get off since they can’t be responsible…? What….. ?

It’s interesting seeing the law differences, in Canada this would be considered criminal and anyone up to the owner can be held accountable. I think it’s only been used and upheld a few times though.

Westray bill c45

Edit, looks like it’s been used more since I checked last.

In Canada there’s laws that can hold the owner accountable for stuff like this.

Bill C45 in Canada

No hate here, would love to see an update in a week or so myself.

We all make due with what we have, some people can only grow some herbs on their north facing balconies since they get no direct sun.

You sauté to soften and pan fry to crispen would be the difference I guess. So starting from a “soft” or “hard” ingredient, but both require same amount of oil and heat. I’ve never thought of them differently, since they’re the same action.

English and French terms?

Usually you need to spray or toss the stuff with a small amount of oil first, or stuff has natural oils. The term is usually for using “another oil” so I would say adding oil would be a must instead of its own oils myself.

Slow frying would be an apt description for a confit duck breast.

Nah more the introverts were finally free to turn down social invites from overbearing extroverts. Why do introverts always need to accommodate extroverts, but not the other way? Cant have a night in chilling playing games… cant always be clubbing every weekend… but no… thats boring apparently….

Covid really made it okay to say no to these people and that’s okay.

So what happens if a patient lies about their concern and a 15 minute checkup is all of a sudden a 45 minute spiel. You can’t just leave a patient you’re treating, they try to allow for some leeway, but they’re a business too after all, can’t be sitting around either.