Tartas1995

I don't think highly of those misogyny groups that call themselves mra. But honestly, I have heard them complain about all these things.

But hey, sexist, who calling other sexist sexist, are still sexist and can fuck off.

I just remove the tracker

To be fair... merz was always a boot licker.

IP law is not a good term? "Intellectual property (IP) law" is not a good term? We should tell everyone, even wikipedia is using it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property

How the hell is IP law connected to mining? But honestly yes, landowners should own the mining rights for their land and/or should have the right to buy them before it is sold to anyone else. It is not difficult to see why you don't want someone dig under your land.

I won't argue about the value of explanation from a ~~lying~~ hallucinating machine.

But I like how your use case is "it does the things that I believe to be useless and time wasting for everyone involved. But instead of, pushing for the end of these time wasting acts, I waste a little less time with llms (instead of all of the time by not doing these time wasting acts) while still wasting the time of the reader." What an efficient use case! We should violate IP law, waste drinking water and energy for it!

Using llms for math questions is probably the worst usage for llms.

And all of this is easily calculated without ai. You can literally google it and let google do the math for you without ai.

Past tense. You can't change the past. Checkmate!

I will change it to "tagged a person who ate raw pasta until they vomited" then we don't need to update each other :)

Corrected.

Now I have 1 user tagged as "tags users with strange stories".

The tech industry is effectively exclusively based in IP law, but to create LLMs they felt comfortable to completely ignore IP laws, and they will sue you if you would break IP law that favors them.

I think you are right and yet so wrong.

My problems with ai aren't unique and I am no special snowflake who see through the matrix while everyone else is distracted. I am just a dude. I really doubt that the points tell I will bring up, is anything boring as generic arguments against ai.

My problem with data theft is not based on the concern that artists has the rights on their work. I want them rewarded for your labor but in this case, it is not my primary issue. It is the hypocritical nature of company entirely based in IP law stealing IP protected work. I hate that the system is not ripping them into piece like Nintendo rips an online super smash tournament into pieces. It is so obviously "rules for thee, not for me". You can claim that capitalism is causing that but I really don't think capitalism requires this shit. Sure the rich and powerful are rich and powerful in capitalism because of capitalism, but special pledging for the elite existed in every system we have tried.

I hate ai because people invest in the dumbest applications for it. LLM are trash. Voice cloner??? Wtf. Image generation? Why?? But for medical applications in which we have comparably amazing clean data, let's invest into that a little bit. But x billions into LLMs please.

I hate ai because the most brain dead application gets the most usage and people will tell you how it is bad but use it anyway. Then they obviously don't have the computing power to run a decent local model and just pipe any personal or confidential information into the online service that tells you that the data will be used for training, so it can be leaking back out to other people.

I hate ai because it is literally everything bad about society (e.g. nonconsental nudes) and tech (e.g. data collectors) and their interaction.