Right, but I don't see a 'and you can feed it to a neural network on demand such that it can reproduce code that a user can then have plausible deniability that it was licensed on a certain way and be able to redistribute it under an incompatible license"
Tempy
joined 1 year ago
git log --all --graph
I would have thought that you fix it locally, git commit, and regenerate the patch set again. Maybe with optional squashing of commits so each patch set doesn't keep growing.
I don't think the code is the problem they are cleaning up. I think they just want to remove the contributor from the history.
I mean it should. It'll have a steam os installed on the device itself. It'd be a pretty silly oversight to not work with a computer running Linux.
It is. Relatively so. This smells of Mozilla wanting to package things in there that Linux distro maintainers wouldn't package in themselves.
You may say I'm being overtly cynical and as much as I love Firefox, I can't say I trust Mozilla's intentions
Not so much toggled, but you can break out of it. At that point it just becomes a fedora install with a somewhat different set of defaults.
Nope. I make my code open source so the code is there in case someone finds it useful. I ain't supporting it outside of what I can be bothered to do though. It's open source, you chose to use it, it's on you to support yourself.
A bad company. Because they should be delivering a holistic product. But their hardware side knows their shit at least.
What GPU have you got? My 7900XT works flawlessly.
view more: next ›
Fair enough. I don't tend to use it all that much. But it is there. I tend to find I don't really need to see the graph all that much. Maybe because I'm mostly working in small teams. It's just not that important to my understanding of what's going on.