TheOctonaut

Did you at any point between misreading this headline and deciding you'd solved a blindingly obvious problem, think to read the link?

This isn't Twitter. Stop with your responses to 140 characters.

Oh and by the way, "just stay home" is pretty shitty as a solution even in itself because taking years off work is significantly damaging to one's career and women are disproportionately expected and pressured to be the ones to do so.

Your suggestion being that they take loss after loss for some undefined period of time in the hope that it gains a sudden boost in popularity, and should this not occur, presumably also issue the same refunds, to more people, and the extra costs can be handled by... someone?

The ideal would be covering server costs with a subscription; building in peer-to-peer play; or release a self-hosted server application alongside like the old days, but in those cases, nobody would be getting a refund. Clearly these weren't considered options - I have no familiarity with the game itself - so what's the plan? Someone risks their livelihood on the offchance it's suddenly Among Us?

Edit: Oh, It's Mister Beast. In which case I'd take some issue with calling it "Indie" but certainly they should have the financial stability to keep it going a while, and a much better chance of convincing people to play it. On the other hand if that level of advantage couldn't make this game worth playing, maybe it's for the best.

I work for a telecom supplying software to the contact centre.

"Training" here is a euphemism for telling the agent what they did wrong. There are both manual reviews (when a second agent has to deal with the fallout from another agent's fuck up) and random reviews by the "Quality"/audit team. They'll check for example that agents aren't trying to get good feedback scores by giving the customers soft refunds/credits.

Our software is expressly to make agent's jobs easier but I end up listening to a fair few calls to see how we can do this and by God they do a much harder and more cruelly measured job than I do.

No but it isn't wise to generalise two of Europe's less... regulated countries to just "Europe". Pretty much every European country north of the Alps and west of the Vistula have mandatory smoke alarms/fire detection. It's not a mystery why. 5000 Europeans a year die in residential fires and social housing, ie paid for by the tax payers, is disproportionately damaged by fire every year.

You can say where you're from. Nobody's coming to find you.

And yes, I'm probably more emotive about this issue than average. I'm sure that's not a mystery why either.

They are mandatory in Ireland, so please stop the "Europe" stuff.

House fires were a huge cause of death and in apartment blocks they also can let one person's mistake kill hundreds of others.

Instantly?

Hospitals, telecoms, schools, universities, research labs the world over would be left without security updates or tech support. Businesses would crash out, access to everything from Sharepoint to Outlook to Entra ID SSO cut off rendering tens of millions unable to work and likely furloughed or redundant.

Enjoy your accelerationist fantasies if you like, daring to assume that the void would be filled by fucking Linux Mint or something and not literally just Apple. But the idea that it would be instant is even more unhinged than the average .ml stammering about the misunderstood virtues of Russian anti-Imperialism.

It's just a leading question.

Never heard of the guy (not American) so I thought this was how we learned about Randall Monroe's carbon monoxide leak.

If you're trying to prove that I can indeed feel cringe, keep going, you're almost there

All code uploaded to Github is scraped

This is the very simple statement that I was responding to, along with the next line about how using Github is implicit consent to feeding your data to an LLM. If the poster wants nuance, they are free to provide it themselves. You can see in subsequent responses there is none.

Of course them being different matters. That's my point. Not all code uploaded to Github is being fed into an LLM. It is not consent if you are signing a contract demanding that something not be done. It's preposterous even at a surface level.

Github Enterprise Server is different from Github Enterprise Cloud, which is what I was talking about, and which is explicitly not used for training LLMs, and if it were, would absolutely kill Github as a product and likely mire Microsoft in years of litigation.

Frankly I don't know of any software company using Github Enterprise on-prem but I suppose there are probably some CEOs out there who haven't taken the OpEx pill. Maybe deep in the rainforest with Mokele-Mbembe. Certainly in my sliver of the tech industry, telecoms, the idea of owning a server is akin to having a deskphone and an outgoing mail room.