Trail

joined 2 years ago
[–] Trail@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He means battery sizes.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What the actual fuck.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That, and crossovers suck.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Planescape Torment.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

But is it an unintentional oxymoron?

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I am a doctor and my professional name is Dr. ER dude.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why are you calling the children 'shitty'?

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Come on, M&M8 was as awesome as the rest of them.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Anything that can work with Android Auto?

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Trail@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

That's a push response.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When you perform the measurement on which slit the particle passes through, then the measuring device is also part of the system and it affects it. The measurement reduces the degrees of freedom in the system so there are no longer two equivalent ways for the particle to pass through the slits (either A or B), but rather you now have a measured slit and an unmeasured slit. Since there are no longer multiple ways to achieve the same result, the is no longer interference due to equivalent probabilities.

Matt Stassler has a nice series of blog posts on this.

 

I was especially fond of M&M 6 7 and 8 as a kid. I have also played the most recent, 10, which while different and flawed in many ways, was still good enough to be enjoyable. I have also liked things like Wizardry 8 in the past.

I did try to replay 7 recently, but I thought that it has not maybe aged too well as the combat was too grindy for my current tastes.

Can anyone recommend something similar perhaps?

 

Recently bought an A1 mini with AMS, which has been generally great. I have been printing various things, but was thinking if the wasted filament during color changes could be further reduced.

I was wondering, if the color change happens on a high layer, why does the prime tower need to be built as high in order to flush when the color change happens? Is it not a good idea to have the prime tower not generated up until the color change is needed, and then start building it on the plate directly?

This would imply z axis movement whenever the color changes, but is it bad for some reason? It would take slightly more time, but the filament change already takes plenty of time so I assume it is not a factor of the already printed model cooling or so. Could it be something like we want to avoid unnecessary Z axis movements to avoid alignment mistakes maybe with the current layer, if the z movement is not considered precise enough?

Or it is just considered that the aavings of building a shorter tower any not that much comparatively? Anyone more knowledgeable has any thoughts?

view more: next ›