Trail

joined 2 years ago
[–] Trail@lemmy.world 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well. Now I don't use that arch, btw.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

North of afaik

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Duum dudum dum dum duuuum duum

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah I was more like referring to an overflow or something.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] Trail@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Trail@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] Trail@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I had it happen to me occasionally in a work setting many years ago. I was calling it getting a crit from the vendor machine. Happy times.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Chalcopyright.

[–] Trail@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
 

I was especially fond of M&M 6 7 and 8 as a kid. I have also played the most recent, 10, which while different and flawed in many ways, was still good enough to be enjoyable. I have also liked things like Wizardry 8 in the past.

I did try to replay 7 recently, but I thought that it has not maybe aged too well as the combat was too grindy for my current tastes.

Can anyone recommend something similar perhaps?

 

Recently bought an A1 mini with AMS, which has been generally great. I have been printing various things, but was thinking if the wasted filament during color changes could be further reduced.

I was wondering, if the color change happens on a high layer, why does the prime tower need to be built as high in order to flush when the color change happens? Is it not a good idea to have the prime tower not generated up until the color change is needed, and then start building it on the plate directly?

This would imply z axis movement whenever the color changes, but is it bad for some reason? It would take slightly more time, but the filament change already takes plenty of time so I assume it is not a factor of the already printed model cooling or so. Could it be something like we want to avoid unnecessary Z axis movements to avoid alignment mistakes maybe with the current layer, if the z movement is not considered precise enough?

Or it is just considered that the aavings of building a shorter tower any not that much comparatively? Anyone more knowledgeable has any thoughts?

view more: next ›