VonReposti

Jeg vil nok give det en uge mindst og så komme med en opfølgning. En god leder forstår at man er spændt, venter afklaring og måske skal videre i livet. Her kan en lille reminder hjælpe, så du ikke bare er passiv, men er en aktiv søgende. En leder der bliver frustreret over at få en reminder en uge eller to senere er højst sandsynligt heller ikke en leder du ønsker at samle på.

I loved it when I first encountered it. It was simple, elegant, and easy to use. Over time though, things got bad. I relied on an extension to show the taskbar on all monitors as well as the "Other locations" tab in the file manager to see disk usage plus some other things but these two broke the camel's back. Every upgrade the extension stopped working for a few months, but at least I could delay upgrading for a bit. That was until the extension maintainer went AWOL, so no update was made for at least a year.

The "other locations" tab showed disk usage just a click away from my usual workflows. As someone who has a habit of making high utilisation of my disks, keeping an eye on disk usage was required. That was until Gnome decided we were too good for such an easy location so now the only place to see disk usage is in the disk usage analyzer that 1) is rarely used 2) takes a while to start up while it's scanning the entire disk. My habit of checking disk usage thus died. Until I had to upgrade to the new distro version. And it turned out I didn't have enough storage left to carry out the installation so my laptop bricked itself halfway. I was lucky that I could boot with a rescue image to clear some space and continue the upgrade but the first thing I did when it was finished was to install Plasma and kill Gnome.

That's what happens when you leave it in a dry dock for too long.

I haven't been running experimental, so I've yet to experience the new features

I have been looking forwards to the new vehicle patching, I hope it'll solve the issues with collisions my current paths have.

I know batteries could be daisy chained before. I made a large battery park that way.

They're quite likely to survive, even in a worst case scenario. AI isn't going away and we still need hardware to run it. And in a worst case scenario they still have an inventory that keeps a certain value. For a pure AI company like OpenAI or Anthropic, in a worst case scenario their $100B could be worth 0 the next day. There's no inventory to sell out like they could in the housing crisis in 2008 or with internet infrastructure during dotcom.

Those who sell shovels during a gold rush are generally safe. They might be overvalued during the bubble, but the shovels aren't going away. IMO from the little info I have on Cerebras it looks like they're even better positioned since their hardware is uniquely solving AI efficiency. During a market correction people start caring very much about efficiency and is almost entirely allergic to anything that smells of hype. If they need AI hardware they want the efficient ones.

Thing is, they tried to show that public adoption was large enough to warrant a $100B+ value, that basically everyone wanted AI. That was the difference between a $20B valuation and 100+. But several failures have occurred the last few months that hints at the public at large not wanting to adopt their tech in such quantities and the longer they wait the worse a signal it might send for the IPO. Lack of adoption, lack of progress towards AGI, dwindling returns, ballooning costs.

I estimate that the AI bubble will burst pre-IPO or during the IPO, thus not affecting the public at large. There's still a risk that they fudge the IPO numbers hard enough to create FOMO and people wanting to buy but they'd have to go dangerously close to fraud territory to make a good case. Just watch out for the first AI IPOs. There's likely a smaller AI company that'll go first that'll be a canary in the coal mine. If their IPO succeeds the big boys will make an attempt but if it fails they'll likely postpone an IPO indefinitely, making it a long, dragged out market correction, not a quick pop.

Or his dataset consists of 860 people and only 43 said they'd boycott it.

It saddens me that they killed the game, at least on PC. Would have been a great LAN party game with their 4v1 mode.

That would be Denmark.