ZMonster

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's entirely up to them. I sure wish they wouldn't, but capitalism is what it is. And if the mass of metaphorical Beakers hangs their hat on each and every controversial word regardless of bias, then they're going to do that. If platforming chucklefucks keeps the lights on... So there it is.

There should be standards. Agreed. I have literally no say in that and my opinion means literally nothing on this. However, that doesn't mean calling meaningless shit like this out doesn't hurt the rest of us. I'm as sympathetic as the next person. It sucks. But if we are going to cry wolf and alligator tears every single time an already trash organization does a thing you - without a shadow of a doubt - expect them to do, then you are doing their work for them. Stop hitting yourself.

Take it on the chin, ignore them, and move on. I work in one of the most remote places on the planet with about 1000 conservatives, and these aren't the GOP "gays are cool now" conservatives, these are the "gays are pedophiles and we should exterminate them all" conservatives. These are InfoWarriors and flat earthers. Deep state theory is assumedly foundational and antiestablishmentarianism is the MO. I pointed out, a single time, that even Alex Jones said Trump was "mobbed up with the russians" and I have been known as "the liberal" since then. These proverbial tweakers are drawn to plausible deniability like a catalytic converter. Sure, they are the lowest common denominator when it comes to human prototypes, but they are also the low tide and they know it. If they can sanitize bigotry then the cool GOPers will be able to use them to justify it. So we (the opposition to authoritarianism) need to sterilize easily defensible shit like this.

Look at the replies I've received... All I did was point out the plot hole in the assertion implied by OP exposed by the reality that one could say that "the hill" did not say it themselves and furthermore that the hill has a giant warning at the top of the article that literally states they DO NOT hang their hat on opinion pieces (and btw, fuck the hill but they do). All I'm pointing out is to not say the hill explicitly called Harris a liar, because based on the facts, they didn't. Several replies still allude to the culpability of the hill... Which is best case scenario semantic when totally generalized, but more likely consolatory and akin to someone splitting hairs over "travelling" in street basketball.

"The right" could say that "the left" would polish brass on the titanic. And we could know that they'd said it too. But here we are, God forbid we pass a single piece of brass without giving it a mirror shine and then gasp Pikachu faces when the right says "see?".

How did we lose the election? Shit like this. We need to be better than this. This is teaching a pig to sing.

Sensationalism is their game. Leave to play it amongst themselves.

[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

๐Ÿคฃ Trump really is playing 5D chess. You can't nail him down. He's like a bar of soap, that is also a pedophile.

[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago (20 children)

I understand that the hill published this, but it was an opinion article. I get that some people value that, but they are almost never opinions of people that should have an opinion on the matter. Either way, I don't consider opinion articles to be something that you can nail an organization to the cross over. Just sharing a perspective is all.

[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe it's ketamine ๐ŸŽถ

[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Lol, they're wearing hard hats correctly. No, there are no engineers in this image.

[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

We all lost our innocence back then. We stared into the void, unable to look away. You remember how we all were.

[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Pardon me, but Friendster was for friends - Myspace was for tricking people into listening to Nickelback.

[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The significance of whether or not that is true pales in comparison to whether or not the argument is effective, because the argument is EXTREMELY effective and your "truth" affects nothing but your own ego. They will do and say anything they can to get you to call them a Nazi. Obviously you know nothing about Alex Jones.

[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Mike Israetel from RP on YouTube has at least two videos reviewing his "fitness". That was literally all I needed to see.

He put out a video just yesterday on him.

[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you are arguing that the 30-40s US was unlike and unattributed for the Third Reich, then you are obviously correct, but I think you forget that the Nazis existed before Hitler. In the light of what they would become, they were more or less akin to telemarketers. And would THAT fly in the US?

It would

It did

And it always has

[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

America was absolutely a part of the formulation of the nazis. Look up Henry Ford. His plagiarized propaganda was attributed as a source used in the formulation of the final solution. Fuck even Thomas Edison was trying to talk him down. Look at the america first party. Over 20 congressional representatives were in active communication and even received funding from Nazis. Some had received pre written speeches that they actually used.

If anyone "won" anything, it would be the Nazis, not Americans. Because here we are...

[โ€“] ZMonster@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Lol, this legit made my day.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ