I second Valetudo. I’m using it on a roborock S5 and installation was pretty straight forward. Even if it takes more effort to „root“ your vacuum it is definitely worth it. I also integrate my vacuum in HA over mqtt.
But I would assume you're used to using a 'manual' keyboard whereas if you only grew up on touchscreens its probably more difficult to get familiar to.
The prevelance of touchscreens much rather results in people lacking skills/efficiency/speed when using a regular computer keyboard
Start with Docker/Containers.
Once you understand the basics of it you can start selfhosting all sorts of applications from/on your laptop with very little effort. For Docker Command Line Basics there are tons of free tutorials online. If that’s to big of a step in the beginning, start with a Portainer (spinning it up is basically just copy and paste one little command) the rest can be done from the GUI. Docker will also help you to figure out what you might think is worth „selfhosting“ for yourself. Because selfhosting is almost like clothing: Everyone has their own taste and style.
1und1 macht trotzdem in Sachen Verfügbarkeit und Service immer noch „0“
Make sure you introduce your USB dongle through ProxMox to the VM on which HA ist installed. There is an USB-option in the menu for your VM where you can choose which USB device or port from the Host should be passed trough. Once that is done figure out how the USB is connected to your HA VM via the HA shell. Something like
ls /dev/tty*
should give you the path you will need to integrate it into HA (if autodiscovery doesn’t work).
That escalated quickly.
But I guess drugs and friendships never really go hand in hand.
Was looking for that comment 😅
They made private data the „new gold“ which it is today long before social media started exploiting it. Changing their motto /code of conduct „Don’t be evil“ into „Do the right thing“ (for our shareholders) didn’t benefit their reputation either…
„Old habits die hard“
&
"Anything that can go wrong will (eventually) go wrong."
- Added the eventually for Murphy’s law because in its original version it kinda implies that everything that can will go wrong right away
Hatte die Signal Foundation sich nicht schon irgendwo mal geäußert, dass sie für die Schnittstelle zu WA gar nichts „entwickeln“ möchte!?