[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 3 points 1 year ago

Oh no my unjustified beliefs!

[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 6 points 1 year ago

Another way to solve the issue is to have users and communities be instance-independent where the instances only provide storage for communities and users they want to support.

[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 3 points 1 year ago

Find people on the internet who seem similar to you and see what they did and what the result was, see what the best result was and do that. Takes a long time, and may or may not be worth it, but for expensive purchases it may be.

[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 22 points 1 year ago

Its either the fascists, or people trying to make money from tribalism.

[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 11 points 1 year ago

Define what makes a rust program "real" lol.

Any kind of library that does a lot of low-level stuff (kernel syscalls, custom binary reprs, ffi) will have to use unsafe. But most applications built using these libraries rarely need to use unsafe at all, because the libraries act as safe wrappers to make sure the app developer isn't accidentally violating invariants allowed by the "unsafe" keyword.

[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 11 points 1 year ago

"Thank you for the lemmings kind stranger!"

[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 3 points 1 year ago

Well, Roe v Wade set a precedent, which was then reverted ~50 years later, so I'm not sure how much precedents apply to the supreme court (it definitely applies to lower courts tho)

[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 3 points 1 year ago

People can do that now, but only for occupations that qualify as "speech". Owners of "public businesses" (i.e. places that you can walk in to) still aren't allowed to forbid entry to people arbitrarily.

[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 13 points 1 year ago

Very important distinction.

It'd be pretty bad if hotels or restaurants started restricting access based on sex or race!

[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 70 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure about discrimination against customers based on ideology, but I'm pretty sure you can't discriminate against customers based on protected class (sex, race, orientation, etc.) What this supreme court case does (IIUC) is that companies are now allowed to not provide services to protected classes if those services constitute speech. So if you are a restaurant owner, or a hotel, you still can't refuse a gay couple, if you are a cake designer, you can't refuse to make a cake, but you can refuse to do anything remotely gay-related to that cake, if you are a web designer, you can refuse to make something altogether because the government can't restrict or compel speech (and graphic design is speech).

5
submitted 1 year ago by Zyansheep@vlemmy.net to c/videos@lemmy.world

Get ready for one of the greatest scientific throwdowns of the past 3 centuries!

[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 2 points 1 year ago

Is it open source and on fdroid?

[-] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 11 points 1 year ago

I guess they could put (federated reddit alternative) next to the link

view more: next ›

Zyansheep

joined 1 year ago