bleistift2

Ich kenne die Windows-Taste unter Linux ausschließlich als Super. So heißt sie auch in den Shortcuts bei Cinnamon. Deshalb wäre ich nie auf die Idee gekommen, dass andere dieselbe Taste Meta nennen.

Meh. Wieder ein Linux-Anfänger-unfreundlich-ismus.

Ich weiß darüber auch nicht viel. Ich habe nur aus Hilfetexten entnommen, dass die beiden Tasten verschieden sein müssen.

Meta, Super, and Hyper are all keys from the old Symbolics keyboard that X still has internal keycodes for (so they can still be bound to modifiers). Super is still around on modern keyboards, as the Windows/Tux/whatever key next to Alt. It's usually bound to Mod4. Meta and Hyper are both gone. Alt is sometimes called "Meta" because it replaced Meta's functionality; I suspect emacs is mostly at fault for using Alt and Esc as replacements for meta in its keybindings. However, some people refer to the Windows key as "Meta" as well, so you should probably just avoid the term altogether.

https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/119219

Würde ein Drittweltstaat so mit Flüchtlingen umgehen, würde man ihn der Folter bezichtigen.

it has come in clutch a few times

Massive disrespect for not learning a thing.

To paraphrase a German comedian (I’m not even sure who said it).

Women, if you want a man, don’t be subtle. Stop with the playing with your hair and the dreamy looks. Men are stupid. They don’t pick up on that. If you want him, go to him, and say “You, me, sex!”

(Slightly adapted to fit the medium text better.)

Dann eben das gute alte System.out.println() … oder was auch immer das Äquivalent in deiner Sprache ist.

In solchen Fällen singe ich spontan einen Lobgesang auf denjenigen, der den Entkäferer erfunden hat. Ich frage mich, was Programmierer früher gemacht haben, als das Programm ihnen noch nicht selbst erklärt hat, was es tut.

That image you linked requires authentication to download.

Was there supposed to be a “not” under that yellow blotch in the speech bubble?

I think the homeowners are right regardless. You don’t need to be a genius to figure out that even a moderately higher population density increases transportation demand. Even doubling the density could affect traffic considerably.

Now before the haters come out: I’m not saying that the transportation demand must be addressed by more or bigger roads.

Look at the last table in my original post. It contains 26 columns (A–Z), some of which are not shown, and 27 rows (blank–Z). There are 27 rows and 26 columns, regardless of the contents of the table. If the top-left cell (A, blank) were a 1 and (B, blank) were a 2, then (Z, blank) would contain a 26, and ZZ would contain a 702. Nothing about the layout of that table changes.

To summarize: The table will always be lopsided, if you start counting at 0 or at 1.

You’re absolutely right! Those dumb English people are wrong for not adhering to the German spelling reform. How dare they?

Also the spelling reform only changed the previous ß to a ss. The spelling reform has nothing to do with the c/k debate. What was your point again other than brainless insults?