calcopiritus

joined 2 years ago
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The Dow is over 45000! I said over a big number, so it must be good right?

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They already trained their AIs on basically all the GPL code. They don't care.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It's so primitive you can call it whatever. Just as you call it primitive communism, someone could probably argue it is primitive feudalism, capitalism, anarchy, or whatever else.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Maybe shouldn'tve give a presidential coca cola to an openly fascist dorito.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The worst case scenario also being the most common.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Why would they lie about that? If they truly are laying people off because of AI, they could say so and get a boost in investment since everyone seems to be investing in "AI companies".

They could also just hide the fact that their cash cow (Fortnite) is not infinite.

Instead, they told actual reason that make actual sense for laying people off.

Of course, they probably have way more than enough money to pay those 1000 people. And you could critizise them for that instead.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I don't understand how asking that question to "my politicians" would achieve anything.

"My politicians" are not arguing that prices increasing by a bit makes it okay for prices to increase by a lot. I'd argue that most of them would say that a little bit of inflation is good for the economy while hyperinflation is bad. Which I interpret as them knowing that "a little" is not the same as "a lot". Which the above commenter doesn't seem to know. Or at least knows only when it is convenient. Schrodinger's knowledge perhaps.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Idk why you are discarding python for the reason that makes python the best option. If there is a programming language that a non-programmer should know, it's python.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah. If you follow the rules. If trump didn't follow the rules, why would the next administration need to?

Of course they won't because they are democrats. But if the opposition had a spine at all they could just ignore the rules too

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Don't even need to be corrupt. The US administration is so incompetent that you don't even need it. Trump uses twitter instead of official channels to make announcements. If you own twitter, you can just put a delay on trump's tweets and let you read em before everyone else.

Not that this isn't corruption, just that they are incompetent in addition to corrupt.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Not expensive? I just checked. It's 8€/m for me. Which means 96€/year.

Maybe that's not expensive for the USAians that earn hundreds of thousands per year. But it is expensive to just remove a few ads that can be easily blocked. It won't even stop the Google tracking, it just stops the ads on YouTube. An ad blocker will also block the tracking.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Funny how that only works one way. It's never "they are gonna tax me anyway, so I'll pay double the taxes".

If you are not fine with paying more than you should, why are you fine with prices increasing more than they should?

 

For those that don't know: Mount Balrior Raid Expert is an achievement of the new W8 raid. To get that achievement you have to obtain 100 points for each of the bosses of the wing. You obtain one point for each person in your squad for whom it was the first kill time ever that they kill that boss.

  1. It is a pyramid scheme. By design, only about 1/11 players can get it (at best).
  2. It encourages people that don't wanna train to do trainings. They are irritated more easily and are way less patient towards new players. Because they don't wanna train new people, they only want to get the achievement.
  3. It will only be harder as time goes on to get this achievement, further increasing the toxicity of it, as people rush to get it.
  4. It makes non-training runs worse. If there is an underperformer, you can't kick him because people will get angry that they wont get points for the achievement and they will leave. If you don't kick him, you'll both waste time on easily preventable wipes and people will also leave because of it.

Training runs should be done by people that actually want to train. If you want to encourage trainings, you should reward re-clearing wings, doesn't matter if it's a training run or not.

 

I want to do basically this:

struct MyStruct < T> {
    data: T
}

impl < T> for MyStruct < T> {
    fn foo() {
        println!("Generic")
    }
}

impl for MyStruct < u32> {
    fn foo() {
        println!("u32")
    }
}

I have tried doing

impl < T: !u32> for MyStruct < T> {
    ...
}

But it doesn't seem to work. I've also tried various things with traits but none of them seem to work. Is this even possible?

EDIT: Fixed formatting

view more: next ›