calcopiritus

joined 2 years ago
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The X just sends a signal to your application. If you ignore that signal, it will just do nothing.

That signal tells your application to clean itself. Maybe the changed how that "cleaning itself" worked, in a way that lead to actually ignoring the signal all together.

The thing is easy to break. The question is how that even got past QA testing. Or even just any other dev testing.

A single person launching the program and trying to close it should see the bug.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

Jokes on you. Boost does not support spoilers, making it 0 clicks.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They can also have their fat taken and not put into anyone though

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The UN is not a society. There are many groups without a leader. But when talking about anarchism, people usually mean anarchist society.

That's like saying FAANG is anarchism, because they talk among themselves without there being a leader.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

The Dow is over 45000! I said over a big number, so it must be good right?

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They already trained their AIs on basically all the GPL code. They don't care.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

It's so primitive you can call it whatever. Just as you call it primitive communism, someone could probably argue it is primitive feudalism, capitalism, anarchy, or whatever else.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Maybe shouldn'tve give a presidential coca cola to an openly fascist dorito.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

The worst case scenario also being the most common.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Why would they lie about that? If they truly are laying people off because of AI, they could say so and get a boost in investment since everyone seems to be investing in "AI companies".

They could also just hide the fact that their cash cow (Fortnite) is not infinite.

Instead, they told actual reason that make actual sense for laying people off.

Of course, they probably have way more than enough money to pay those 1000 people. And you could critizise them for that instead.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don't understand how asking that question to "my politicians" would achieve anything.

"My politicians" are not arguing that prices increasing by a bit makes it okay for prices to increase by a lot. I'd argue that most of them would say that a little bit of inflation is good for the economy while hyperinflation is bad. Which I interpret as them knowing that "a little" is not the same as "a lot". Which the above commenter doesn't seem to know. Or at least knows only when it is convenient. Schrodinger's knowledge perhaps.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Idk why you are discarding python for the reason that makes python the best option. If there is a programming language that a non-programmer should know, it's python.

 

For those that don't know: Mount Balrior Raid Expert is an achievement of the new W8 raid. To get that achievement you have to obtain 100 points for each of the bosses of the wing. You obtain one point for each person in your squad for whom it was the first kill time ever that they kill that boss.

  1. It is a pyramid scheme. By design, only about 1/11 players can get it (at best).
  2. It encourages people that don't wanna train to do trainings. They are irritated more easily and are way less patient towards new players. Because they don't wanna train new people, they only want to get the achievement.
  3. It will only be harder as time goes on to get this achievement, further increasing the toxicity of it, as people rush to get it.
  4. It makes non-training runs worse. If there is an underperformer, you can't kick him because people will get angry that they wont get points for the achievement and they will leave. If you don't kick him, you'll both waste time on easily preventable wipes and people will also leave because of it.

Training runs should be done by people that actually want to train. If you want to encourage trainings, you should reward re-clearing wings, doesn't matter if it's a training run or not.

 

I want to do basically this:

struct MyStruct < T> {
    data: T
}

impl < T> for MyStruct < T> {
    fn foo() {
        println!("Generic")
    }
}

impl for MyStruct < u32> {
    fn foo() {
        println!("u32")
    }
}

I have tried doing

impl < T: !u32> for MyStruct < T> {
    ...
}

But it doesn't seem to work. I've also tried various things with traits but none of them seem to work. Is this even possible?

EDIT: Fixed formatting

view more: next ›