calcopiritus

joined 2 years ago
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Factorio does have high quality graphics, sounds an animations. It is just in 2D instead of 3D.

But if you price a product based on its cost instead of its value, you do you.

I prefer to pay 30k€ for a car than pay 60k€ for a worse car that happens to have a steering wheel made out of solid gold.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

That was not the point. The point is that Factorio is in a similar level of quality. That is the top one. If you believe that 3X€ is too expensive for a top game, then you are saying that every game out there that is >30€ is overpriced.

If you believe that, you are honestly way out of touch with reality. 30€ is on the low side of a price for a game. Most AAA games are >60€.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

No AAA value? It's up there with Minecraft and terraria as one of the best games.

I'd say it's better than any AAA if you consider the games above "indie"

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The X just sends a signal to your application. If you ignore that signal, it will just do nothing.

That signal tells your application to clean itself. Maybe the changed how that "cleaning itself" worked, in a way that lead to actually ignoring the signal all together.

The thing is easy to break. The question is how that even got past QA testing. Or even just any other dev testing.

A single person launching the program and trying to close it should see the bug.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Jokes on you. Boost does not support spoilers, making it 0 clicks.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

They can also have their fat taken and not put into anyone though

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The UN is not a society. There are many groups without a leader. But when talking about anarchism, people usually mean anarchist society.

That's like saying FAANG is anarchism, because they talk among themselves without there being a leader.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

The Dow is over 45000! I said over a big number, so it must be good right?

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They already trained their AIs on basically all the GPL code. They don't care.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

It's so primitive you can call it whatever. Just as you call it primitive communism, someone could probably argue it is primitive feudalism, capitalism, anarchy, or whatever else.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Maybe shouldn'tve give a presidential coca cola to an openly fascist dorito.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The worst case scenario also being the most common.

 

For those that don't know: Mount Balrior Raid Expert is an achievement of the new W8 raid. To get that achievement you have to obtain 100 points for each of the bosses of the wing. You obtain one point for each person in your squad for whom it was the first kill time ever that they kill that boss.

  1. It is a pyramid scheme. By design, only about 1/11 players can get it (at best).
  2. It encourages people that don't wanna train to do trainings. They are irritated more easily and are way less patient towards new players. Because they don't wanna train new people, they only want to get the achievement.
  3. It will only be harder as time goes on to get this achievement, further increasing the toxicity of it, as people rush to get it.
  4. It makes non-training runs worse. If there is an underperformer, you can't kick him because people will get angry that they wont get points for the achievement and they will leave. If you don't kick him, you'll both waste time on easily preventable wipes and people will also leave because of it.

Training runs should be done by people that actually want to train. If you want to encourage trainings, you should reward re-clearing wings, doesn't matter if it's a training run or not.

 

I want to do basically this:

struct MyStruct < T> {
    data: T
}

impl < T> for MyStruct < T> {
    fn foo() {
        println!("Generic")
    }
}

impl for MyStruct < u32> {
    fn foo() {
        println!("u32")
    }
}

I have tried doing

impl < T: !u32> for MyStruct < T> {
    ...
}

But it doesn't seem to work. I've also tried various things with traits but none of them seem to work. Is this even possible?

EDIT: Fixed formatting

view more: next ›