calcopiritus

joined 2 years ago
[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

You cannot manifest LNG out of thin air either.

Maintaining a solar panel is even more trivial than refueling.

EDIT: not to mention that maintaining that "existing infrastructure" goes beyond just refueling of course.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago

I'm kinda glad they won't. If I tell you how easy it is to install an ad blocker and you don't, you're just funding my leeching through your data and time that you claim has no value.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not dogs though. If they don't work hard to find the perfect pooping spot, they ain't pooping.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

You'll save a lot of laundry time if you pull your pants down before pooping.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

We already can convert a heat differential into electricity.

Converting "just heat" into electricity is impossible though, that would break the laws of thermodynamics and create a perpetual motion machine. There is heat literally everywhere, even the coldest things we have made are not exactly 0K. So you could create electricity for free anywhere.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Not a movie, but death note.

If the dude didn't take the obvious bait every episode there's no way of catching him.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Shocking. A generation that was told since childhood that gender roles are so important that they actually change your gender gives importance to gender roles. Absolutely no one could see it coming.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

The sentences are very different (7-10 years to 42 years), but to be fair, the crimes are also different.

1 time might be a "mistake", 2 times is a trend. Also, I don't know the specifics. I know children are not legally able to consent to sex with an adult, but I would punish harder in the case that the child doesn't even "consent" to it. Maybe the boy "consented" and the girl didn't. Also, I assume the "young woman" is an adult, so she definitely didn't consent.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Why would I want anarchism if it would not change this?

Then not only do I have to worry about the largest state, which may or may not want to kill me and is thousands of kilometers away. But I would also have to worry about my neighbors, which I have many at less than 100m away from me. And I would also have to worry about the largest state even more because I wouldn't be in a state myself that could defend me against the largest one.

"My system is not worse than the current one because your concerns about my system exist in the current one" is not a valid argument when "concerns about my system" is way larger than the ones in the current one.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes it is. In Spanish it is "No a la guerra". I found it weird that they translated the quote but didn't just change 4 for 3.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Minor nitpick. But it seems the actual article has been edited and no longer says "four words" for obvious reasons. Could update the summary too.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Nono. You see, Israel wanted to bomb Iran, but the US knew that if that were to happen, Iran would attack the US. Therefore someone should stop this situation! So they bombed Iran harder to avoid the retaliation from Israel's planned attack. What else could they have done?

/s

 

For those that don't know: Mount Balrior Raid Expert is an achievement of the new W8 raid. To get that achievement you have to obtain 100 points for each of the bosses of the wing. You obtain one point for each person in your squad for whom it was the first kill time ever that they kill that boss.

  1. It is a pyramid scheme. By design, only about 1/11 players can get it (at best).
  2. It encourages people that don't wanna train to do trainings. They are irritated more easily and are way less patient towards new players. Because they don't wanna train new people, they only want to get the achievement.
  3. It will only be harder as time goes on to get this achievement, further increasing the toxicity of it, as people rush to get it.
  4. It makes non-training runs worse. If there is an underperformer, you can't kick him because people will get angry that they wont get points for the achievement and they will leave. If you don't kick him, you'll both waste time on easily preventable wipes and people will also leave because of it.

Training runs should be done by people that actually want to train. If you want to encourage trainings, you should reward re-clearing wings, doesn't matter if it's a training run or not.

 

I want to do basically this:

struct MyStruct < T> {
    data: T
}

impl < T> for MyStruct < T> {
    fn foo() {
        println!("Generic")
    }
}

impl for MyStruct < u32> {
    fn foo() {
        println!("u32")
    }
}

I have tried doing

impl < T: !u32> for MyStruct < T> {
    ...
}

But it doesn't seem to work. I've also tried various things with traits but none of them seem to work. Is this even possible?

EDIT: Fixed formatting

view more: next ›