They already trained their AIs on basically all the GPL code. They don't care.
calcopiritus
It's so primitive you can call it whatever. Just as you call it primitive communism, someone could probably argue it is primitive feudalism, capitalism, anarchy, or whatever else.
Maybe shouldn'tve give a presidential coca cola to an openly fascist dorito.
The worst case scenario also being the most common.
Why would they lie about that? If they truly are laying people off because of AI, they could say so and get a boost in investment since everyone seems to be investing in "AI companies".
They could also just hide the fact that their cash cow (Fortnite) is not infinite.
Instead, they told actual reason that make actual sense for laying people off.
Of course, they probably have way more than enough money to pay those 1000 people. And you could critizise them for that instead.
I don't understand how asking that question to "my politicians" would achieve anything.
"My politicians" are not arguing that prices increasing by a bit makes it okay for prices to increase by a lot. I'd argue that most of them would say that a little bit of inflation is good for the economy while hyperinflation is bad. Which I interpret as them knowing that "a little" is not the same as "a lot". Which the above commenter doesn't seem to know. Or at least knows only when it is convenient. Schrodinger's knowledge perhaps.
Idk why you are discarding python for the reason that makes python the best option. If there is a programming language that a non-programmer should know, it's python.
Yeah. If you follow the rules. If trump didn't follow the rules, why would the next administration need to?
Of course they won't because they are democrats. But if the opposition had a spine at all they could just ignore the rules too
Don't even need to be corrupt. The US administration is so incompetent that you don't even need it. Trump uses twitter instead of official channels to make announcements. If you own twitter, you can just put a delay on trump's tweets and let you read em before everyone else.
Not that this isn't corruption, just that they are incompetent in addition to corrupt.
Not expensive? I just checked. It's 8€/m for me. Which means 96€/year.
Maybe that's not expensive for the USAians that earn hundreds of thousands per year. But it is expensive to just remove a few ads that can be easily blocked. It won't even stop the Google tracking, it just stops the ads on YouTube. An ad blocker will also block the tracking.
Funny how that only works one way. It's never "they are gonna tax me anyway, so I'll pay double the taxes".
If you are not fine with paying more than you should, why are you fine with prices increasing more than they should?
The Dow is over 45000! I said over a big number, so it must be good right?