Jokes on you. Boost does not support spoilers, making it 0 clicks.
calcopiritus
They can also have their fat taken and not put into anyone though
The UN is not a society. There are many groups without a leader. But when talking about anarchism, people usually mean anarchist society.
That's like saying FAANG is anarchism, because they talk among themselves without there being a leader.
The Dow is over 45000! I said over a big number, so it must be good right?
They already trained their AIs on basically all the GPL code. They don't care.
It's so primitive you can call it whatever. Just as you call it primitive communism, someone could probably argue it is primitive feudalism, capitalism, anarchy, or whatever else.
Maybe shouldn'tve give a presidential coca cola to an openly fascist dorito.
The worst case scenario also being the most common.
Why would they lie about that? If they truly are laying people off because of AI, they could say so and get a boost in investment since everyone seems to be investing in "AI companies".
They could also just hide the fact that their cash cow (Fortnite) is not infinite.
Instead, they told actual reason that make actual sense for laying people off.
Of course, they probably have way more than enough money to pay those 1000 people. And you could critizise them for that instead.
I don't understand how asking that question to "my politicians" would achieve anything.
"My politicians" are not arguing that prices increasing by a bit makes it okay for prices to increase by a lot. I'd argue that most of them would say that a little bit of inflation is good for the economy while hyperinflation is bad. Which I interpret as them knowing that "a little" is not the same as "a lot". Which the above commenter doesn't seem to know. Or at least knows only when it is convenient. Schrodinger's knowledge perhaps.
Idk why you are discarding python for the reason that makes python the best option. If there is a programming language that a non-programmer should know, it's python.
The X just sends a signal to your application. If you ignore that signal, it will just do nothing.
That signal tells your application to clean itself. Maybe the changed how that "cleaning itself" worked, in a way that lead to actually ignoring the signal all together.
The thing is easy to break. The question is how that even got past QA testing. Or even just any other dev testing.
A single person launching the program and trying to close it should see the bug.