cimbazarov

joined 2 years ago
[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's the root of their success. I don't expect them ever to change while the American empire exists (even in a diminished state).

[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean alot of the people who will suffer are not the ones who have committed the evil of the empire.

But what sucks is you are still kind of right. There is no path I see to a revolution where the material conditions are comfy for the masses. Revolutions happen when the oppressed can longer stand their oppression. I don't know what the theory behind accelerationism is any further than material conditions getting rapidly worse creating a revolution. The system under the democrats was what seemed like a boiling frog situation. We were going to destroy human civilization while exploiting the rest of the world with a moral guise. And because of how the system individuates and pushes us towards consumption to alleviate our alienation, I never thought it could result in any meaningful revolution. Ironically it's the fascists that changed this slow decline, but by replacing it with a faster one.

I do think accelerationism, or maybe just a small taste of accelerationism, is what gets us to build an actual socialist future.

[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 days ago

I can see the appeal of him to boomers. They have this perceived superiority over the younger generation that is founded on nothing but being older than them, and people like Maher reinforce that

[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Ah gotcha, that makes more sense than what I was thinking. Yea like other people said here I think co-op is the way to go.

[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I'm totally inexperienced when it comes to organizing so take this with a grain of salt, but you might want to just focus on solving the issue at hand before making some rule for communist purity. That way you can be more far reaching in gathering a community around it.

If you are personally a communist and you set a good example in your community then naturally people may follow. But starting from the top down with communism is probably not going to help and might put your project dead on arrival.

[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 days ago

Do you have any socialist orgs near you? Honestly I think that would be the best people to have discussion with as in-person > online (though that's just my preference)

[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

sure this is a cost-cutting measure

I'm so tired of hearing this. We're going to annihilate the human race to cut costs

[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's there only weapon. Being morally superior. Actually it's not even moral, it's just being an ass kisser to whatever laws in place and assuming it's moral because it's a law.

[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know go and java best, but I can pick up new stuff

[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Y'all need a programmer for anything? I might be interested

[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A strong argument for why you should never appease them, but that's all the democrats do and thus you have this rightward shift of the political spectrum in America

[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

A frequent issue i see with "apolitical" people is that in reality they reinforce the status quo (ruling political ideology) and they are hostile to any effort to try to circumvent it because it's seen as political and they're against any politics. It's sort of a deadlock because they arent aware of just how political they are actually being by doing nothing.

view more: next ›