I mean alot of the people who will suffer are not the ones who have committed the evil of the empire.
But what sucks is you are still kind of right. There is no path I see to a revolution where the material conditions are comfy for the masses. Revolutions happen when the oppressed can longer stand their oppression. I don't know what the theory behind accelerationism is any further than material conditions getting rapidly worse creating a revolution. The system under the democrats was what seemed like a boiling frog situation. We were going to destroy human civilization while exploiting the rest of the world with a moral guise. And because of how the system individuates and pushes us towards consumption to alleviate our alienation, I never thought it could result in any meaningful revolution. Ironically it's the fascists that changed this slow decline, but by replacing it with a faster one.
I do think accelerationism, or maybe just a small taste of accelerationism, is what gets us to build an actual socialist future.
It's the root of their success. I don't expect them ever to change while the American empire exists (even in a diminished state).