The internet, as experienced by most humans today, primarily consists of ads, sponsored content, propaganda and spin. I don't really see how it's contributing to our development in a constructive manner.

32% voted NASDAQ, huh?

Oh, fuck. He's optimistic

1 every 5 years?? Yeah, ok, Mr. Popular.

He was more like that Bond parody with Rowan Atkinson. Bumbling and fumbling while bragging and shagging.

Britain is not holding up its end here, producing the mega-shagger we need to save us all.

• Makes a game about beating the shit out of people

• Complains about offences to public order and morals

Serious question: what actually is the value of hard work?

The country.

That someone has a job working for the railway? In the UK? And that they're measuring distance in kilometres? Now, that would be interesting.

Am I suffering some kind of confirmation bias, or does Spock spend an unusually large amount of time expressing emotions, for someone who's supposed to never express emotions?

EDIT: By way of addressing some of the replies to this post, without replying to them all individually, I just wanted to add this:
I'm not critiquing the handling of Spock's character in relation to TOS or movies, Peck's a great actor and is doing a fine job at interpreting this role.
The point I'm trying to make is that Spock (and data, T'pol, Tuvok, etc. after him) gets juxtaposed so often, it seems more entertainment-oriented than story-oriented. Like, "wouldn't it be cool if they had to...". The classic sitcom trope of putting the awkward person in a public-facing position, with hilarious consequences. It just seems like these hilarious consequences are occurring too often to call it character development.

I'd go as far as to say that it's not a trend, it's a prerequisite.