[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

This will greatly enhance the intelligence of future generations and make education accessible to almost everyone on earth at a similar high level.

I don't think that accessibility in AI somehow correlates with the intelligence of the subjects using it. It can actually work in the completely opposite way where people blindly trust it or people get used to using it in a degree that they're unable to do anything without the help from the technology. Like people who are unable to navigate 2 blocks from their house if they don't use google maps navigation even though they do the same route every day.

[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

If large companies and influential people move to Mastodon [...] and no ads.

large companies and influential people are in the commercial platforms because of the ads. There is literally no reason for them to move in a place without ads.

[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

meta (threads) will not support fediverse already. They said they will do in some later version. So for the completely practical part, you don't need to do anything right now.

[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 58 points 1 year ago

meta is not here to promote open networks. They will do more harm than good. If you want to learn more about how google achieved it with the XMPP you can read the story here https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html written by one of the core developers.

[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you missed the point where the open source devs were in a constant race to adapt to all the google-"innovations" and actually troubleshoot on them which ends up demotivating

[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

i don't agree. I think it is important to maintain a blacklist instead of a whitelist where people would then submit what they need to add which will then will need to be approved etc. It will decrease the federated experience.

[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

you can actually see even the username/passwords when one user logins

[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I’m a software engineer

if you're a software engineer you should had known to make constructive comments and also most importantly realise that you are on a Non-commercial open source one-man-project. Your attitude is disgusting and you sound like the guys that nobody wants to work with. Nobody forces you to be here and you're welcome to go and please take your cancer with you on your way out.

[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

using your credit/debit card to verify your account is something that I also wouldn't like to do. Same as using my ID

[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

but you're still "visiting" it. It is just your reader that makes the https request instead of your browser. In their logs and stats you are still visible. The only difference is that you will have a user-agent that shows that it is an RSS reader instead of a browser. Like:
"GET /atom.xml" 304 0 "Feedly/1.0 (+http://www.feedly.com/fetcher.html; 16 subscribers; like FeedFetcher-Google)"
And while you've the RSS reader open it while make requests periodically so we're talking for multiple visits as well.

[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

that's not true. There are open source 3rd-parties like Infinity that are non-commercial.

[-] duringoverflow@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

yes, they're following the same approach. I'm really curious, didn't they see all the backslash that elon mask's actions had? Or did they see it but they believe that since twitter is still online, it means that they were correct actions?

view more: next ›

duringoverflow

joined 1 year ago