I explained why humans don't have this tic in the comment you're replying to. LLMs imitate humans, but they're not perfect.
Regardless of whether it happened here, would you agree that undeclared use of AI is problematic? Or is that what we're really arguing about?
This was just the first time it felt important enough to comment. I was really excited by the premise of the video and really disappointed to find evidence of AI. Because it’s sneaky and good at approximating human speech, I thought it was worthwhile pointing that out so that others who may have missed it can properly evaluate this person’s effort and expertise.
See the “Em-Dash Pivot” here. The “Not just X – Y” is a common LLM tic. Walk over to your nearest vibe coded slopware website for plenty of examples.
And it is bizarre. Who describes gowning up to enter a clean room as “transitioning” into it? Why the extra verbal flair right there, of all places? A human reserves that kind of emphatic phrase for something actually important, not the difference between walking into a room and “”””transitioning”””” into it, whatever that is supposed to mean.
Thank you, I do know how cleanrooms work. None of my friends, family, or colleagues that work in cleanrooms have ever described cleanroom gowning in this way. The overly excited emphasis on this mundane point combined with the weird phrase "transition into it" are indeed bizarre.