this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
61 points (96.9% liked)
Videos
17998 readers
119 users here now
For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!
Rules
- Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
- AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^
Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
See the “Em-Dash Pivot” here. The “Not just X – Y” is a common LLM tic. Walk over to your nearest vibe coded slopware website for plenty of examples.
And it is bizarre. Who describes gowning up to enter a clean room as “transitioning” into it? Why the extra verbal flair right there, of all places? A human reserves that kind of emphatic phrase for something actually important, not the difference between walking into a room and “”””transitioning”””” into it, whatever that is supposed to mean.
You dont just "walk" into a clean room, because u would drag dust in. You transition into a clean room by dedusting yourself, geting into suit that prevents skin flakes from contaminating the room. I find nothing bizarre about how this is phrased. And to be fair i aint sure if you paranoid or trolling.
Thank you, I do know how cleanrooms work. None of my friends, family, or colleagues that work in cleanrooms have ever described cleanroom gowning in this way. The overly excited emphasis on this mundane point combined with the weird phrase "transition into it" are indeed bizarre.
It's an llm tick because humans do it. This is a completely invalid form of analysis, if it was an em-dash that would only be evidence because standard keyboards don't have an em dash key.
I explained why humans don't have this tic in the comment you're replying to. LLMs imitate humans, but they're not perfect.
Regardless of whether it happened here, would you agree that undeclared use of AI is problematic? Or is that what we're really arguing about?
The emphasis makes sense because of the nature of the project, a human would do it in this context.
Undeclared use of ai is problematic but I care verv little, there are bigger problems.