[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 28 points 3 months ago

The entire web is built on standardized e2e encryption schemes fought for by techie nerds so that we don't have these problems there.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 36 points 3 months ago

Definitely no shady VPNs run by white westerners though. Theyve all got impeccable morals through ans through. Glad you cleared that up.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 23 points 4 months ago

I doubt you'll hear any docs about failures. I think that's what this article is about? I.e. a lack of transparency?

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 26 points 4 months ago

I think that is what they're saying? I.e. "let Taiwan fight for themselves and stay out of it western nations"?

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 87 points 4 months ago

Reading this new CEOs job history on linkedin is kinda infuriating. She goes from intern to head of consumer products at Skype in less than a year. Just... Frustrating to read that while I am and manage really good people who struggle for decades in the trenches to get even paltry job opportunities.

But she got her MBA from Stanford so nepotism ahoy I guess.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 66 points 5 months ago

It's 2024 and congress still wants people to come in to the office to raise their hand.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 25 points 5 months ago

These people will literally apply the death penalty for jaywalkers as long as the jaywalker is "them* (i.e. non white l, male, or just someone they slightly disagree with) and then scream online about how theyre protected from censorship by the first amendment.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 23 points 5 months ago

To be fair, the supreme court has made the same argument when granting themselves absolute immunity. But it was just as stupid then (and still theoretically only applies when executing their job).

"We could never do anything if we had to worry about lawsuits all the time" yes, that's how life works for everyone who makes decisions.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 22 points 6 months ago

Immunity isn't in the constitution for anyone. The supreme court just made it up at one point to try and keep themselves from being sued. I assume that's what they're appealing with here. No one knows how it works because, again, they just made it up.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 21 points 6 months ago

They've taken things yo faster before when there is a time imperative to do so. There is here. They're breaking their own precedent.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 84 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I remember something similar to this when my mom died 15 years ago. Lots of aunt's and friends reaching out to my sister to support her, traveling across the country to visit. I don't think I ever even got a note.

But I do have the thing where I probably wouldn't have cared either, if not for watching the support my sister got, it never would have occurred to me someone could do those things. And I know those people aren't my actual friends, so I really had zero expectations from them. I think it was more the insult on top of injury that bothered me. "Not only do we not care, but we're going to show you what we would be doing if we did care."

I never took this as a boy/girl thing though. I never fit in in life, still to this day. Just sorta expected.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 26 points 10 months ago

I was in dehi recently. Poverty is kinda nuts there, but I noticed everyone had phones, even people who obviously had no home. I assume kinda shitty phones, but it makes you realize a bit how important access is. If someone releases an iOS only app with no web version, they're basically saying fuck you to all those people.

Same same for this though. Googles saying "as long as you use our stuff you'll be fine, and why wouldn't you use our stuff because it's free! (Sometimes kinda sorta). And if you're stuck with something else for some reason, fuck you."

view more: next ›

ferralcat

joined 10 months ago