108
A president tries to subvert an election has immunity from being prosecuted for trying to subvert an election.
That’s authoritarianism.
No worries, if that's the ruling Biden can just stay in office and jail his political opponents. These idiots have absolutely no self-awareness and will say whatever they need to in the moment.
If PotUS is immune to all criminal prosecution, Biden can hunt SCotUS justices for sport.
He should march down there and arrest the whole supreme court. Hold them for an hour while they think about their legal position, then send them to bed without supper.
Even better, we could get an awful lot of money if he were to sell game tickets to the highest bidders. In the name of egalitarianism, I would suggest that teams should be allowed so that the lower income people can band together and pool their money for a slot.
They are already accusing Biden (and other democrats) of trying to do that and worse...
the judicial branch "cannot sit in judgment over a President's official acts."
That's the entire premise of checks and balances.
He's never struck me as understanding the slightest thing about the role of president.
Also, the President has no official role in the elections process. At most, the Justice Department might investigate violations of the Voting Rights Act (what little remains), but the President wouldn't be involved in this at all.
And instructing an armed crowd to march on Congress to stop the certification of the vote of DEFINITELY not in his official duties. So even if we accept that Presidents are immune while doing official duties (which they aren't), then he's still not immune.
What the fuck is the Constitution actually good for if these fucks can just magically ascribe the meaning to random sentences written by old fucks over 200 years ago when horses were the mode of transportation.
Immunity isn't in the constitution for anyone. The supreme court just made it up at one point to try and keep themselves from being sued. I assume that's what they're appealing with here. No one knows how it works because, again, they just made it up.
Lots of immunities are in the Constitution. Others are part of the legal framework upon which the Constitution relies. And others were made up whole cloth from an incorrect reading of history (such as the special immunity conferred to LEO commonly referred to as “qualified immunity”).
Qualified immunity is among the worst things that has ever happened to this country. Maybe even worse than ruling that corporations are people but can't be given the same consequences that people are given because they're corporations with lots of money. Excuse me, I mean lots of freedom of expression.
Yeah, QI is pretty awful. The awfulness is compounded by the fact that the reasoning which created it relied upon ahistorical information and in places where it actually makes sense for some level of immunity to be available, that immunity is covered by other principles.
Any immunity that police require should be covered by Good Samaritan laws.
What the fuck is the Constitution actually good for
Honestly, not much of anything, and it hasn't been for a long long time
It's been over one thousand days since the Jan 6 attack, the trial has not even begun.
The GTA 6 leaker was sentenced to life 2 weeks after it happened
The GTA 6 leaks were in September 2022, so a little more than two weeks ago!
Well yeah, everyone knows you're not allowed to leak confidential information unless you're the president.
It’s okay if you’re a republican and named trump.
It's nothing to do with either of those and everything to do with being a wealthy, high-ranking politician.
He wasn’t “sentenced to life.” And yes, criminal trials involving a lot of moving parts and complex legal theories take time to investigate and bring. Are you suggesting that due process and the rule of law should be ignored?
Yep. He committed the leak while on bail from other cyber crime. indicated he would continue engaging in criminal behavior. Was violent towards others while incarcerated. Deemed not mentally fit. And is indefinitely held in a psychiatric facility until a point in time he seems mentally fit to be released and not continue criminal activity.
Hmmmm..."due process later" - Trump
If he somehow gets granted immunity (which, despite all of the special treatment he has received and is continuing to receive, I find extremely unlikely because that would mean every single president past, present, and future would be similarly immune from prosecution for any crimes whatsoever), we need to be rioting in the streets.
I'm not healthy enough to be rioting or spending even a couple days in jail, but I'll fucking do it anyway. This is fascism with no exaggeration. If this goes through and my fellow Americans grumble and shrug their shoulders.... I don't even know. Maybe I would be rioting against everybody sitting in their houses letting it happen.
Someone should toss that orange shitstain out a window.
A low window.
Just high enough that he’s really badly hurt. Maybe like breaking his coccyx.
At his age tripping on level ground could do it.
Follow him around throwing caltrops in front of him everywhere he goes.
Interesting that they want to argue that he's immune and not that he's not guilty.
WTF is this immunity argument? America doesn't do kings.
this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
108 points (97.4% liked)
News
23024 readers
5154 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS