49
submitted
10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
by
fiat_lux@kbin.social
to
c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
Title changed from original for better internationalisation, because the ABC hates assuming you see their articles outside of their specific site categories.
Original linked article title:
"Pride, but also grief': Government to start taskforce following disability royal commission final report
Linked article lead paragraph:
After an inquiry lasting four and a half years, the royal commission makes 222 recommendations for change.
Some numbers from the Inquiry itself:
- 222 recommendations (mostly for federal government)
- 32 public hearings
- 7,944 submissions from the public received
- 17,824 Phone enquiries
- 1,785 Private sessions held
Some of the findings:
- There are around 4.4 million people with disability in Australia, or 18% of the total population. Reflecting that disability increases with age, the number of people with disability falls to 2.4 million when we look at people aged under 65 years. This is 12% of this age category.
- Around 35% of First Nations people under 65 had disability in 2018–19, nearly three times higher than the general population. Children accounted for 24% of all First Nations people with disability.
- As at 31 December 2022, there were 573,342 participants in the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS).
- Across all age groups, people with disability experience considerably higher rates of violence than people without disability. People with disability also experience violence more frequently. This is unacceptable.
- Rates of violence are particularly high for: Women with psychological or intellectual disability, First Nations women with disability, young women with disability.
- Neglect of people with disability occurs in multiple forms and across different stages of their lives. We heard of many instances of people being deprived of necessities of life and assistance with daily activities. We also heard of systemic failures to provide an environment for each person to maximise their potential.
- The data on exploitation of people with disability is limited. However, people with disability shared with us experiences of both sexual and financial exploitation by other individuals.
Some of the recommendations (my summary):
- A new Australian Disability Rights Act
- Intersectionality, especially with First Nations peoples
- Legal obligation to prove 'unjustifiable hardship' as reason for not making accommodations for a person with disability
- Alter the migration act to prevent systemic disability discrimination, (amongst many other laws)
- Requiring the government to provide interpreters, both spoken language and sign language
- Transitioning to non-segregated education settings
- Transitioning to removal of 'group homes'
- Creating a National Disability Commission as an independent statutory body to monitor outcomes, with a majority leadership by people with disabilities
- Legal obligations for guardians to show they're attempting to act in the best interests of their guardee
- An extra $36 million in funding for disablity advocacy and insurance programs
- Making a number of restraint techniques and solitary confinement illegal in health, justice and education settings
- laws to prevent non-therapeutic permanent non-consensual sterilisation of people with disability
- Increased housing protections for tenants with disability
- teacher, police and healthcare worker training and requirements, especially around cognitive disabilities
- a registration system for disability support workers that defines their roles and requirements and gives them benefits like sick leave and retirement savings
- lots more data and reporting being published by the government
- way better complaints processes and investigations
- targets for disability employment at all levels of public service, including executives
- so many more.
Edited to add: A better breakdown of recommendations by category instead of my casual list
If we are, we're emergent behavior, not the topic of study.
Frankly, simulation theory feels a lot like other previous "humans are super special!" ontologies. We're not, we're just organic bags of complex chemical processes like every other lifeform on Earth, with all the cool potential and shitty vulnerabilities that such a thing entails. I've yet to see anything which truly sets us apart as a species beyond the need to ascribe a meaning to our mortality.
Also, phys.org is (yet again) trash and have just reposted this piece as "news" from a book advertisement by the author on theconversation.com but altered the title in a small but meaningful way that conceals the disclosure
Phys.org title:
Original title: