306
submitted 1 year ago by bady@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Loss in terms of money or efforts. Could be recent or ancient.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ActualShark@lemmy.blahaj.zone 178 points 1 year ago

China's Four Pests campaign is a great example. As the campaign says, China had a bit of a pest problem. One of these particular pests was the sparrow. The government decided it would be a great idea to launch an "exterminate sparrows" campaign. The only problem was sparrows ate other pests such as bedbugs and locusts.

In short, they sucessfully curbed the "sparrow problem" and replaced it with a "locusts and bedbugs problem". This ultimately upset the ecological balance and further lowered the rice yields. It was a complete disaster

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 34 points 1 year ago

Sounds exactly like a China thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bady@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

One of the best examples of unintended consequences, aiding in one of the largest human caused disasters.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Noughmad@programming.dev 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The great leap forward was such a colossal clusterfuck that you can't blame it on any one thing (although most of them would be prevented without the authoritarianism). Literally everything was wrong. Sparrows, lysenkoism, forced collectivization (basically, and perhaps ironically, farmers not owning the means of production), Mao just being evil, backyard burners, rigid chain of command that gave the chairman absolute authority but at the same prevented him from knowing what was going on, everything.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 169 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Brexit. As historical blunders go, this has a beautiful unambiguous purity.

[-] bady@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

I agree, but unlike usual blunders this was very much planned!

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Once the campaigns were underway, yes. But the opportunity came from a huge blunder by David Cameron. He called the referendum expecting an easy win for the remain side that would silence the anti-EU faction in his party and shore up his position as PM. Instead, the anti-EU faction won, prompting his own resignation and causing damage to the UK's economy, a loss of global influence, the loss of British people's right to live and work in the EU, and reopening difficult issues in Northern Ireland that had been laid to rest for years. It also arguably sped up the Conservative Party's lurch to the right and its embrace of UKIP-like policies, disempowering Conservative moderates and leading to the spiral of ever less competent governments we have seen since then. In particular, Boris Johnson's rise was a direct result of post-referendum power games among Conservative politicians.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] famousringo@sh.itjust.works 104 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We’ll there was that time Kublai Khan tried to invade Japan with the largest amphibious assault in history (until D-day) and got absolutely wrecked by a typhoon.

Then tried again a few years later, with an even larger force, and got wrecked by another typhoon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasions_of_Japan

[-] Lamedonyx@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

You can't leave aside the fact that those typhoons were called "Divine Winds", or kamikaze.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 98 points 1 year ago
[-] DoisBigo@lemmy.eco.br 20 points 1 year ago

The Las Vegas Loop.

(known on dictionaries as a tunnel)

And nobody have died there yet.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago

World War I didn't do anyone any good whatsoever; including any of the various parties that might be blamed for starting it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 82 points 1 year ago

Napoleon's invasion of Russia. It led what might be the first great infographic ever though. Charles Minard’s Infographic of Napoleon’s Invasion of Russia from 1869 (Carte figurative des pertes successives en hommes de l’Armée française dans la campagne de Russie en 1812-1813)

Tan colour line from left to right is the trip from France to Moscow, 1mm line weight = 6000 soldiers, black colour line from right to left is the trip back to France. The line slowly thins and diverges like a tree branch until 422k soldiers are whittled down to 10k returning. Not quite the outcome Napoleon had intended.

[-] UnverifiedAPK@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

Also the temperature at the bottom showing how cold it was on the way back. It explains why everyone died in the river.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

King Pyrrhus of Epirus. He was known for winning battles against superior armies, at the cost of taking heavy losses. He was once quoted as saying "If we are victorious in one more battle with the Romans, we shall be utterly ruined."

He was so famous for this, that the term for a victory that devastates the victor bears his name, a Pyrrhic victory.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mpolmanteer@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago

Knight Capital - They were biggest equities trader in 2012. They manually deployed code and didn't get configuration right and it reactivated "Powder Peg". They lost $460 M in 45 minutes and went bankrupt.

[-] PhantomPhanatic@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

The program was called "Power Peg" for those googling for it. It was a test program not intended to be used on the live market.

The Power Peg program was designed to buy a stock at its ask price, and then immediately sell it again at the bid price, losing the value of the spread.

The Worst Computer Bugs in History: Losing $460m in 45 minutes

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 23 points 1 year ago

I get the impression that power peg is a risky google.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago

When the Spanish were raping the New World in the 1500s for gold, they dumped enormous quantities of platinum into the ocean because it was the wrong kind of shiny metal. Nobody in Europe had any clue how valuable the stuff was, only that it was often used to counterfeit gold. But since it wasn't gold, or even silver, everyone thought it was worthless. This was exasperated by the fact that nobody could melt the stuff until the 1800s. But mostly it was just not yellow enough for the idiots at the time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

Do you guys remember that time u/Spez took the reddit API away from third party apps?

[-] protput@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately most reddit users didn't even notice. Or just don't care.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 1 year ago

The Jan. 6th insurrectionists who thought Trump was going to pardon them all because they were heroes.

[-] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Or that they were doing the middle class any favors by fucking up the nation's credit score (as it were) with their smooth-brain fuckery. 🤦🏼‍♂️

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mintiefresh@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 year ago

Buying Twitter for 44B and renaming it to X.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lemmylefty@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Since December 1982, the O-rings had been designated a “Criticality 1″ item by NASA, denoting a component without a backup, whose failure would result in the loss of the shuttle and its crew.

Richard Feynman[:] “… [the shuttle] flies [with O-ring erosion] and nothing happens. Then it is suggested, therefore, that the risk is no longer so high for the next flights. We can lower our standards a little bit because we got away with it last time. You got away with it, but it shouldn’t be done over and over again like that.”

Taken from an excellent writeup of the fatal 1986 Challenger flight.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

Never forget that Reagan heavily pressured them to not delay for political reasons

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Elon acquiring Twitter for $44B in the first place, not taking into account the subsequent blunders. He not only overpaid too much for a social media company without even understanding it, he also wrecked Tesla's stock price as investors saw he was clearly spending too much time on Twitter and he had to panic sell Tesla shares to fund his Twitter adventure. He easily wiped out hundreds of billions from Tesla's market cap during that time.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 56 points 1 year ago

The Gunpowder Plot. Guy Fawkes and his friends were about to blow up parliament, and on the week it was supposed to happen, one of his accomplices sent a letter to a noble. In what was probably the worst example of "asking for a friend" in history, it asked "hypothetically, what would happen if someone went into the basement and blew up parliament". The noble did what nobody expected he would do and, get this, responded to the letter. People searched the palace basement and found Guy Fawkes, he was arrested and killed, and we have Guy Fawkes Day. The reason this led to a loss is because the king of England at the time used it as an excuse to persecute Catholics and make the holiday which is used as a taunt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] idle@158436977.xyz 55 points 1 year ago

Chernobyl comes to mind as the biggest fuck up ever. Whenever I think I fucked up I try to remember, it can never be as bad as Chernobyl.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 1 year ago

Russia invasion of Ukraine. They used to be number 2 army with sophisticated weapons. Now they are number 1 world laughing stock with weapons that works exceptionally well for invading Mars but not on earth.

[-] Klame@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 year ago

As they say, from number 2 army in the world to number 2 army in Ukraine.

Now with a risk of becoming number 2 army in Russia...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ram@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 year ago

Didn't really result in a loss, but a huge missed opportunity, when AT&T turned down an offer for them to purchase the early internet.

[-] bady@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

At least something we can all cheer about :)

This also reminds me of Yahoo turning down the offer to buy Google in their early stage! https://finance.yahoo.com/news/remember-yahoo-turned-down-1-132805083.html

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bermuda@beehaw.org 34 points 1 year ago

I'm willing to nominate Charles II, King of Spain as a formerly alive blunder. The result of decades of Hapsburg inbreeding, he had a number of health and intellectual issues from birth and he was notably infertile. If you live in a monarchy where succession is passed down through children, it's REALLY BAD to be infertile and be King. His death directly caused the War of the Spanish Succession, a 13-and-a-half year war that eventually involved pretty much all of western Europe and likely led to the deaths of over 1 million people.

Literally could have avoided this if the Habsburgs decided to have sex with other people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] yads@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

Target's failed expansion into Canada. It's taught as a case study on what not to do in business schools now.

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Walmart's attempt to break into the German market is hilarious

Burger King tried to open up in France and literally nobody would eat their muck. So when McDonald's tried, they had to completely change their menu and service style. Hence, "McDo's" in France is actually quite good

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Well, Russia, in 2022...

[-] mewpichu@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In terms of money and business, my fav is how Xerox didn't know how to market/capitalize on what was effectively the first personal computer before personal computers were even a concept, which is estimated to be a $1.4 trillion mistake.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DarkDarkHouse 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Long-Term Capital Management was a hedge fund founded in 1994 that had notable academics and Nobel Prize winners on its board. It was very successful in the early years (while critics warned of the risks) and eventually collapsed in 1998, losing $4.6 billion in a matter of months due to its leverage and impacts of currency crises. The US government stepped in to shore up the financial system. It's taught as a case study in how a strategy can post impressive returns but quickly turn into a wipeout.

[-] RealAccountNameHere@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago

The first thing that came to mind, oddly enough, was Blockbuster refusing to buy Netflix for the equivalent of a rat and a string to swing it with.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

Scotland trying to colonize the Darien gap It bankrupted Scotland and forced the union of England and Scotland to be the UK.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Coming down from the trees was a pretty big blunder. Nothing but losses ever since.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

The Battle of Manzikert led directly to the end of the Roman Empire, all because of mismanagement.

[-] panggul_mas@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Battle of Manzikert

If I saved one person the 4 calories worth of finger movements required to open a new tab and Google this themselves then I'll go to sleep happy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
306 points (99.7% liked)

Asklemmy

44148 readers
1334 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS