A winning horse?!
It's hard to imagine how you could pick a horse less likely to win.
This sounds an awful lot like doing nothing
What does that even mean though?
No, it's because your various claims are delusional, borne of a lack of perspective and self awareness.
One of us sure is stuck in a bubble.
As long as the rule of law and checks and balances can be continued afterwards
Historically that never happens and it's naive to think that it would.
Even if that were true, and it seems unlikely, that's still an order of magnitude more than the ladybug devs.
Of course it's arbitrary.
It doesn't take much self awareness to realise that having a president pick and choose which SCOTUS rulings they think are ok, is exactly the type of authoritarian autocrat you're trying to avoid.
Sorry mate this is just bonkers.
It might seem that way but it's a fairly arrogant assertion. They're a sophisticated organisation with a lot of well experienced people guiding them. As an outsider it's easy to criticise their seemingly endless series of bad decisions, but I'm still confident that internally all of these decisions seemed like a good idea at the time.
Besides which, this would be a good reason to fork their codebase rather than starting from scratch.
Surely, surely, a significant portion of conservative voters can see that this isn't what democracy should look like, even if they're ardent republican supporters.
My partner of 12 years and mother of my children got citizenship in my home country a few days ago. It's been a long and difficult road to get here.