Thank you kindly
imaqtpie
first of all, this disagreements just focuses on the ‘birth’ part, which is not the main part of my original statement. Replace ‘place of birth’ with ‘place of education’ or ‘origins’ and you got the same result.
Fair enough.
last, being born male can also comes with innate disadvantages (less tolerance to pain, less flexibility) and acquired disadvantages (less elegance, more competition), not even including the hardship of being trans in our societies and the impacts of transition treatments. ‘Male chromosomes advantages’ mostly are strength and endurance, which are not the only factor in sports.
So you do acknowledge that there are innate differences between males and females, although you prefer to focus on the disadvantages rather than the advantages.
Plus most of the factors that disadvantage women in sports come from social background rather than biological ones.
I would agree with that statement. But that still means that if you equalized the social differences, the biological ones would remain. Although it would be a much smaller discrepancy, it still wouldn't be an even playing field. It's just unfair, and that bothers me.
And in the end, we cannot observe an overwhelming winrate in favor of trans athletes.
This isn't a topic where the statistics are helpful whatsoever. The sample size is way too small, and there isn't any control group, so the relative performance of transgender athletes could be significantly affected by any number of variables aside from their transgender status.
Looks like you accidentally reposted this FYI
Tfw responding to a text message is the most social thing you have done all week
Yes that does look like vote manipulation. Thank you for notifying us. Those accounts will be banned.
You could disassociate with Dessalines by stopping using Lemmy. But you choose not to. Why do you continue to associate yourself with Dessalines by using Lemmy?
Perhaps because your association with Dessalines is motivated by something completely tangential to his political stances? Then you ought to understand that the same is likely true for Nutomic.
Do you ever let the kids play games with butt scooters like these? If not I would highly recommend adding them to your curriculum. Those things were the bomb
Everything exists on a spectrum. You're choosing to see things in black and white, but that doesn't correspond to reality. I am absolutely certain that you hold political views that many other people would characterize as unacceptable and unethical. However, I also recognize that even though you may be wrong about certain things, that doesn't completely erase your value as a human being. I can only hope that you someday come to understand this fact.
Depending on the sport it can have. Come and try to beat some of the old ones of my town to a game of Pétanque, i guarantee you being born in France would help you.
If someone was born in France but then moved to another country as an infant and grew up somewhere else, they wouldn't have any advantage at Petanque as a result of being born in France. Thus we can easily observe that the location of birth is not a significant factor in determining ability, but rather the socialization that occurs as a young person can be a factor. We can use the birth location as an imperfect proxy for making assumptions about developmental experiences, but it's not a direct influence.
In contrast, if someone were born with an XY genotype (male) and socialized as a female from birth, that person would still possess inherent athletic advantages over females. Biological sex has a direct influence over the physical characteristics of an organism.
It's not a slight difference, it's a fundamental difference that makes your comparison flawed.
The stage task was absolute cinema