Interesting that you feel it's not age appropriate. At what age do you think it would be appropriate?
incompetent
joined 1 year ago
Authoritarianism.
That's one small use case. There are many other legitimate uses for them. Seems a bit odd to be so against them because they might possibly be used for nefarious purposes. Have you personally been victimized by a VPN user?
What's wrong with VPNs for personal use? Serious question; I've never seen someone opposed to them.
I didn't know that, thanks.
I'm out of the loop. Who's doing that?
They have no job
Tell them to get a laptop
A few things to note:
-
it is a historical landmark building, you cannot just start doing shit to them without going through the proper channels.
-
it is in the city of Washington DC, and they need to be included in the process.
-
they have not provided plans, something needed for literally any construction project.
-
they are not even bothering to shield the site, so anyone from any intelligence agency from any country can watch.
-
Congress holds the purse strings per the US Constitution. The president cannot just unilaterally do this shit. This is what autocrats do.
Oh? And what are you doing?
Not sure what this fuss has been about, but I'm glad I switched when I did.
The fuss is about those who haven't switched yet. They're being forced to swallow a big, fat AI pill.
I don't get the joke. Please elaborate.