Especially when you read between the lines

In very few cases were the schools being used by Ukrainian forces, which would have made them legitimate military targets. Schools also suffered damage when Russian forces withdrew from the areas they had occupied and the schools their forces had deployed in, which had become military targets by their presence.

This report is definitely trying to whitewash Ukrainian use of schools as shields. They focus primarily on the use of school buildings by Russian forces as bases while hand waving Ukrainian troops stationing themselves near schools that are full of civilians.

I don't know about you, but I think stationing troops and weapons around an elementary school is a much bigger violation of human rights than using an empty school building.

Broke: Bush did 9/11

Woke: Reagan did 9/11 with his army of spy birds

Whining about being bullied after starting a fight and doubling down on lib takes.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago

Damn, 1500 man years wasted a day on Twitter

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

They're banned btw, they reported you folks first and I banned them before your report even came in lol

At least the extended answer is correct

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 84 points 7 months ago

They almost never include necessities in these calculations. To them the real measure of economic activity is the price of 65" TVs dropping 10%, not rent going up 100% or housing prices going up 200-300%, or food prices going up 60%.

Hey, you can get a smart TV for 85% the adjusted price of one last year and wages have gone up .8% on average meaning you can open another tv! Why are you complaining?

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 75 points 8 months ago

Communist

gargantuan-bronze-lenin-head

We're just a bunch of nerds that read the news and lots of political and economic theory, have a good understanding of the history of capitalism and class consciousness.

10

Not really much else to say. Just that I find the similarities funny.

27
[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 107 points 10 months ago

It's an incredibly active, explicitly communist instance that scares instances that are more liberal or right wing because we don't tolerate people who use buzzwords or generalizations or just "reddit politics" speech in general.

We're also incredibly hostile to bigotry, which turns out to scare a lot of moderators and admins that can't directly from Reddit as they tend to have a lot of unexplored bigotry.

58
OG Hexbear Design (hexbear.net)

Printed this before the sub closed.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 77 points 11 months ago

Here's a full story

Ionia County Judge Ray Voet said the accident was a “horrible tragedy” but didn't warrant jail or probation for Darin Wilbur (Owner)

If a homeless man sneezed on someone he'd be calling for the death penalty.

“Two months later, we wouldn’t even be here,” the judge said, noting that the teen soon would have turned 18 years old.

The $1100 fine for permanently disabiling a child was too much.

Defense attorney Howard Van Den Heuvel said Wilbur hired the teen, a high school dropout, as a way to help him. He said the boy was warned to never put his hand inside the grinder.

Blame the child who lost their hand to a greedy boss.

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net to c/poverty_finance@hexbear.net

So I did a bit more research, it seems that there are tons of loan programs under the USDA umbrella. Lots having to do with farming, but also lots having to do with "rural development".

These loans fall under something called the SFH Direct Loan Program (for nonfarm tracts). Which you can read more about here and see the forms here.

There are multiple tiers of these loans and they are all dependent on income and ability to pay. They work almost inverse of a typical mortgage loan where the only thing that matters is your history with on time payments and having at least an average credit score. They start at 3.25% interest for "Low Income" individuals and families (determined by a chart that's bucketed by county). Seems to be between $45k and $65k on average for "Low Income" and the "Very Low Income" group is anyone below the $20k poverty line.

All these income buckets are determined by number of applicants with deductions disabled or child dependants (about $10k taken off your net income per dependent). You can also deduct medical expenses. So the name of the game is trying to figure out how to structure who in your family will be on the loan to get the lowest mortgage rate (1% with the grants for very low income applicants, but these need to be repaid if the house is ever sold).

All these loans are given out directly by the government meaning you don't owe a mortgage to a bank, but to the USDA itself. You have no down payment if you are accepted and are allowed to purchase any "quality" home that's at or below the loan limit for your area (seems to be around $300k plus or minus in most places).

So if you're really desperate and live outside a major metropolitan area, this might actually be an option to break out of the rental hellscape or if you have a bad mortgage and think you'd qualify this might be a way to refinance directly through the federal government.

I'm by no means offering you any financial advice, and an definitely not a financial advisor, but this program seems to genuinely have some merit and honestly I think it could work as a greatly expanded solution to the housing crisis, directly government issued mortgages with downwardly adjustable rates, long terms, and income based grants.

1

We're being booted from our rental because the landlord wants to let his daughter move in and we can't find anything else around here for even remotely the same price. Even rotted out single wide mobile homes are going for $1800/month.

I was turned onto USDA loans by someone and it seems like as long as we make under $65k/year we can qualify for like $336,000 in loans with 0% down.

Is there any catch? The rates seem to start at 3.5% of you're under the $65,000 income limit which would put our monthly payments like $300 below renting.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

invalidusernamelol

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF