jaaake

joined 2 years ago
[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

This article is sensationalizing a non-issue. It reads like the author went to the convention with the story already written and then tried (and failed) to find people that supported the premise.

As someone who attended GDC for the full week this year, I can tell you that not a single conversation I had or panel I attended discussed the RAM shortage. I'm sure this topic arose in some circles, especially anything related to the timing or cost of next gen hardware. As a professional AAA game designer of 25 years and an occasional game director, this does not affect the way that the games themselves are made. Games on consoles already have their limitations, games on PC should always be (but not always are) optimized to work across a broad spectrum of hardware configurations, with the minimum spec being the lowest system possible without sacrificing playability.

Even people interviewed in the article are saying the same thing:

“Does this affect us? No,” Subotnick said. “We’re making games on as many platforms as we can to delight consumers. Could it impact us? Sure. If there’s less devices for people to get their hands on, then we potentially have less consumers to sell to. But right now, I’d argue that there are plenty of consumers with plenty of devices for us to sell these games to. Where it could impact us is, sure, we will have to make decisions around next-gen platforms when they tell us that it’s time to bring content to them. And if they are threatened to have a total addressable market that is viable from a business standpoint, sure that’s a business challenge. But right now all I’d be doing is speculating on a bunch of hypotheticals.”

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Or against the metal tube that ventilates smoke

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I mean, it's a hot take, I'll give you that. I can't agree with it, though. Every line of dialogue in that film moves plot. It's really well edited and far ahead of its time. Modern cinema owes a lot to the lessons taught by Casablanca.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Inception isn't that great.

It's complex for the sake of complexity and the complication needlessly makes the story more difficult to parse. The revelation about there being an additional layer before reality is such an overused trope that it wasn't an interesting twist and added nothing to the plot.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've never had tuna salad with avocado, and now I really want to try it. Thanks for this!

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Children don't have money, why would the US govt care about them?

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

As a Jew, I've got a different take (which I just posted in that thread):

He doesn't want to say Israel, because people conflate Israel with Judaism. He's also making the focus a singular discreet and addressable issue, without bringing up the fact that the formation of the state of Israel has been a problem since the Nakba.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He doesn't want to say Israel, because people conflate Israel with Judaism. He's also making the focus a singular discreet and addressable issue, without bringing up the fact that the formation of the state of Israel has been a problem since the Nakba.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How prominent Honey, I Shrunk The Kids (1989) was at the time you first saw Star Wars (1977).

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

They also have a video that is my favorite way to explain how colorblindness affects me:

https://youtu.be/uRNKxAy049w

 

Every year, my partner of a decade and I have Christmas with her family. My family is Jewish and we also spend at least one night of Hanukkah with them. For all gatherings (including birthdays) the gifts are almost exclusively chosen and purchased by the one who is more directly related to the recipient. It always feels a little weird to me that their family gets me gifts, but they never receive anything exclusively from myself, it's just very vaguely implied that the gifts are from us as a couple. To be fair, their parents give gifts as a couple (always from their mom). Also, I would never ask my partner to purchase gifts for my family in addition to theirs, they're already stressed enough by finding something for their own family. I've never brought this up with my partner as I don't want to make them feel either obligated to or guilty about implicitly declaring that they don't want to.

 

I see news articles that the vote to release the files might not happen until the first week of December, but yesterday saw a massive dump of emails.

Are these two separate things? Why are they categorized like this? Do we know how different they are from each other? Who has actually seen what's in the files?

 

Nobody likes voting for the “lesser of two evils.” Casting a vote in favor of someone who is diametrically opposed to your viewpoint(s) absolutely sucks. The shitty reality is that we aren’t going to change the electoral process in the next two months.

If you don’t see either major candidate as a champion that you can support, it seems more beneficial to see it as selecting your enemy for the next four years. I would rather fight against someone that I have a chance of changing. At minimum I would rather protest against someone that I think has a lower chance of authorizing lethal force against a march that I attend.

Voting for a 3rd presidential candidate (or not voting at all), is letting someone else make that decision for you.

That said, we have got to get out of this constant cycle of only having two options. There’s too much money at a national level to start there. We’ve got to start local and get third party candidates into offices at a city level, then state, then national. It’s going to take a long time and it should have happened so very long ago. We can’t change the past, we can only change the future. The only time to start changing the future is in the present.

 

Shoe gazey

view more: next ›