jaaake

joined 3 years ago
[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)
[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

But only one of them is named after a fortress built from sausages.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

This.

There's so much stuff that is real difficult to pull off in live action and is super simple animated. One of the main characters is a talking cat. And honestly, just having him in his boxers the whole time will be less weird if animated.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Live your dream, big guy. Go after that statuesque giant of a lady.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

what if we took both teams and put them in a third arena...

There was a Korean reality show that kind of did this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical:_100

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 74 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (13 children)

These are the bathroom doors at a brewery near me. I don't understand why more places don't do this. If it's a single stall bathroom, it's all that matters.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Schrödinger’s Cartouche

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Hear me out.

Infinite life imprisonment.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The human brain is weird. The sentence started with Popcorn, so I had to read it three times before I finally got "Crimea" instead of "Cinema." Genuinely thought this was an article about a war documentary film.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Also, I think in this context "in space" means "in the vacuum of space" not "inside a controlled atmosphere at zero Gs"

 

Nobody likes voting for the “lesser of two evils.” Casting a vote in favor of someone who is diametrically opposed to your viewpoint(s) absolutely sucks. The shitty reality is that we aren’t going to change the electoral process in the next two months.

If you don’t see either major candidate as a champion that you can support, it seems more beneficial to see it as selecting your enemy for the next four years. I would rather fight against someone that I have a chance of changing. At minimum I would rather protest against someone that I think has a lower chance of authorizing lethal force against a march that I attend.

Voting for a 3rd presidential candidate (or not voting at all), is letting someone else make that decision for you.

That said, we have got to get out of this constant cycle of only having two options. There’s too much money at a national level to start there. We’ve got to start local and get third party candidates into offices at a city level, then state, then national. It’s going to take a long time and it should have happened so very long ago. We can’t change the past, we can only change the future. The only time to start changing the future is in the present.

 

Shoe gazey

view more: next ›