Yeah, general rule would be not to go drinking in public unless it's explicitly allowed. Even if it isn't illegal, I suspect you could still have people or the police bother you.
jacksilver
joined 2 years ago
I think it also comes down to the fact most people aren't going to label the transaction "illegal drugs". But it does make it easier to track payments and build cases against people (or oppress people depending on the government/police).
But that's kinda the flaw in all of it. If I live with other people, any one of them can let the vampire in, but he never got permission from me then it's not about individual permission.
If we say anyone with authority over the space can let someone in, then that would probably extend to the law or property owners.
Not to mention a bunch of it is false/misleading.
Yep, bind mount the data and config directories and back those up. You can test a backup by spinning up a new container with the data/config directories.
This is both easy and generally the recommended thing I've seen for many services.
The only thing that could cause issues is breaking changes caused by the docker images themselves, but that's an issue regardless of backup strategy.
Not sure how much I trust Trump, but yeah Mike Lee (who introduced the bill) is someone who just likes introducing bills. The fact no one else joined him means this article and conversation is about all he could expect to actually happen.
Nice to see ranked choice voting working.
Not that it doesn't work, but just nice New York can actually fight over more valid candidates without spoiling the election (not that I care for Adam's or Coumo either).
The Supreme Court onky stated the injunctions must be "narrower", but didn't provide specifications as to what that means (to my understanding/recollection). They could still say a statewide injunction is too broad.
But yeah, I agree, I don't know how you have a patchwork of injunctions on birthright citizenship. It just sounds do stupid. Either it is or isn't legal, and you probably should figure it out before allowing it to affect anyone.
But the Republicans on the Supreme Court clearly don't care about the law anymore.
The Supreme Court hasn't actually decided if it's illegal or not. This is just about injunctions to stop Trumps EO.
That being said, it's also a federal issue so you couldn't get a patchwork like abortion.
Unless I'm missing something?
When talking about birthright citizenship, how do you get narrower than nationwide injunctions?
What the Republicans in the Supreme Court seem to be arguing is that the president can ignore the law as long as the people affected can't afford a lawsuit.
Yeah, I don't think anyone has issues with having some age check/protection. The issue is how you set it up and the privacy implications.
I didn't even realize they had already made a third season. It was three years between S1 and S2, but six months between S2 & S3? That's really odd.