We were supposed to have GoA4 in the yard, but the fact that has not been implemented displays the level of faith in the system...

Most of those man-hours are paid for by RTG et. al, not on taxpayer dime. Lost productivity is harder to quantify, but both that and the diesel and bus operator hours are drops in the bucket compared to the transitway days. It is easy to find pictures of the bumper to bumper bus pileups on Albert and Slater.

I may remind you that the city paid an unprecedented amount of this project out of pocket. Doing it right (Automated light metro, like the SkyTrain or REM) wasn't an option, especially for a project with as tenuous support as the LRT had.

It's easy to criticize, but in many ways, Watson had no other choice than to stay the course, at least if he wanted the project to go ahead and to stay in office. As imperfect and inept as he was, he had a vision for the city, not something that can be said of many Ottawa mayors.

Fun fact: As it is now, zero major changes would be needed to run the trains at GoA4 (full automation with no driver onboard), just changing the settings on the onboard computer (VOBC).

When it rains it pours...

Except the costs for stage 1 and 2 per kilometre are the second lowest of all Canadian transit projects, adjust for inflation (REM is 1st, but they got more ROW for free). We could have built a heavy rail system, but it's not like anything is irredeemable with it as it is. The costs of running R1 service are a drop in the bucket when you look at what MTL and Toronto are paying for their new builds vs what we pay for ours.

You can call it unreliable. You can call it dinky. But good luck trying to call it expensive.

Maybe things are different in Boston. The general rule is the older the office the better it will work, and I'm betting that Boston has some pretty old office buildings.

What I can say is that this is a pretty popular political football at the moment. I wouldn't be surprised if this it was initiated by the mayor and not the planning department.

I doubt this will work. Office buildings are structurally and architecturally very different from residential buildings. In a recent case in my home city of Ottawa, it cost the developer the same amount to retool an office building for residential as it would have for them to tear it down and rebuild a new residental tower in its place.

I think it's important to note that this isn't just throwing money in to a hole. The stuff we donate is mostly made in Canada, so there's some economic kickback

or you could just teach your children not to play on the tram tracks. the world is full of pointy edges. must we bubble wrap them all?

aye

Transit has a pretty slick UI and uses user data to track busses without GPS! I like it and simped out the $25 to get the pro version before OC did this