mkwt

joined 2 years ago
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

Some of those bags are still on the moon today, in the lockers on the descent stages where they were left.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Obviously, this is why you should keep your habeas attorney on retainer at all times. (/s)

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The planes are adaptable, multirole fighters that can, in fact, fly in all sorts of conditions. The problem is the ratio of maintenance hours to flight hours is really high. I was once quoted that it was an amortized $12k just to turn it on bring the engine to idle, and turn it off again.

Given that reality, in peace time, many operators will pick and choose when and where they fly. In wartime, of course, the way economy will either expand to handle the maintenance, or (more likely, imo) designs will pivot to something more manufacturable and maintainable.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Isn't that similar to the shit that got Turkey kicked out of the F35 program?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

If that's a Tomcat, where's that lizard's RIO?

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

They've had individual -bin versions of a few big builds, like firefox, chromium, and libreoffice for basically forever.

They had something called distcc for a long time too. That let you, the user, cross-compile packages on one machine for installation on different machine(s).

But at the end of 2023, they dramatically expanded the system, adding configuration machinery to install $packagename from source or binary (i.e. not like firefox and firefox-bin). And they set up the server infrastructure to host a much larger number of official binary packages for amd64 and arm64. Around the same time they added a "distribution kernel" as an ebuild, so users no longer had to "compile it yourself". And I think the dist-kernel is now available as a binary.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (4 children)

We really do not want to get that guy started on the mess of Antarctic territorial claims.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (5 children)

You should know: there is no formal definition of "domestic terrorist" in US law. Such a definition would fairly immediately run into problems with the right to free association guaranteed by the Constitution if it existed.

It is a crime to provide material support to foreign terrorist organizations, and the State Department maintains a list of such proscribed organizations. But that list only covers foreign orgs, by law.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (4 children)

OP needs to counter-notice this shit.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Well, and then you need a US customary mass unit when you're designing the things.

Introduce the slug, not to be confused with a pound-mass (lbm), which is distinct from pound-force (lbf).

And then you can start building inertial moments in slug-ft^2.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Gentoo has optional binary packages now.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (12 children)

Nautical miles. The mile that's actually useful.

 

Over the weekend, Judge Nachmanoff made it clear that a large amount of discovery material is to be delivered to James Comey today. The prosecution team from North Carolina seem to be engaging in a series of stall tactics to delay this.

The eastern district of Virginia is known informally as the "rocket docket" because of its fast resolution times for cases.

 

While sitting for a deposition in a defamation lawsuit that she filed, Laura Loomer was asked to explain under oath what she meant by the phrase "Arby's in her pants" (which she earlier penned in a tweet).

Transcript:

Q  Can you explain to me what it means to say to her that "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, Arby's --
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q Answer the question.
A  Arby's sells roast beef.
Q  Right.  Can you tell me what -- why you were talking about "the Arby's in her pants"?
A  Well, it's just a -- an expression.
Q  What is the expression trying to convey?
A  It conveys the reason why she got a divorce by her own admission.
Q  Because she had roast beef in her pants?
A  Yeah.
Q  She'd put roast beef in her pants; that's what you're trying to say there?  You're literally saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I'm saying she literally -- it's so ridiculous.  I'm saying she literally put Arby's in her pants.  Yes.
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection.  Relevancy.
BY MS. BOLGER:
Q  You're not making a slur about her?
A  No.
Q  You're literally saying she put an Arby's sandwich in her pants; is that right?
A  Yes.  That's correct.  That's correct.
Q  Why are you laughing?
A  Because I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  I just think it's so funny.  I just think it's so funny.
Q  What is your basis for saying she put Arby's in her pants?
A  She carries roast beef in her pockets.
Q  What is your basis for saying she puts roast beef in her pockets and in her pants?
    MR. KLAYMAN:  Objection. Relevancy. Harassment.
view more: next ›