No. We don't even know what that is.
We did and agree. Though there were some defending us and being hilarious too.
Sure, we're happy to help!
It's a silly made up thing allos made up to judge the attractiveness of people. It pretends to be 'objective' but attractiveness cannot be, everybody finds different things, physical, emotional, psychological etc attractive. 'Objective' attractiveness is also problematic as it both pretends certain things have always been attractive and is usually bigotted in some way against either groups of people or individuals for not looking a certain way. All in all avoid bullshit like this, it's not good for anybody.
How'd you get this picture of us?
Yeah, completely. 💔
Yeah, she shouldn't be treated that way! Like people for who they are, all they are, not just one part of them.
They actually did something? 😮
Giving in is never the way to win. Fight them instead.
sigh I'd wish they'd give it a rest. They won't because they're all transphobic, but it would be nice.
Oh, we see. [Genuine] Hilarious.
Yay! Glad there are more of us!
[Genuine] What would that mean?
view more: next ›
Oh, no. We just find the [] tone tags better than the slash ones like /srs etc. Hopefully nobody has to look up a guide to what they mean with the [] ones, nor has to guess at what they mean. Plus they are presumably more easily translatable.
Tone tags are necessary in textual mediums a lot of the time but we can all make them easier without having to use a guide, list etc.