[-] opt9@feddit.ch 9 points 1 year ago

They are pretty solid and I trust them. Their spell checker is a bit poor, but Its pretty good for privacy.

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 26 points 1 year ago

Privacy is diametrically opposed to the ability to control the people you rule over, so no state is privacy friendly. There are only degrees of extremism. The poorer countries are more privacy friendly in the world because they lack the resources to spy on everything. If they could they would spy more.

8
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by opt9@feddit.ch to c/librewolf@lemmy.ml

I found both these settings set to False which causes a cpu overload when playing video. Anyone know why?

6
High cpu usage (feddit.ch)
submitted 1 year ago by opt9@feddit.ch to c/librewolf@lemmy.ml

When I play a video from odysee.com on LibreWolf it uses 2-3x the cpu that Brave does to play the same video. It also turns on the fans in my laptop which signals overburden. My laptop has plenty of power so I"m wondering what the problem is. Have I missed a setting or is this just how LibreWolf works?

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago

Duckduck is definitely a good start, but keep in mind it just anonymizes Google search for you. Brave, Quant, Mojeek and more have indexed their own databases. We need entirely different setups to get around Google's massive censorship and opinion shaping algos that Duckduck cannot bypass. Searx is also interesting as it allows you to choose from a large list of different search engines.

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 20 points 1 year ago

Neutral like electricity. It is a force that can be used for good or bad. Google is trying to harness that energy for its own profit and control. I wasn't referring to the structures created to administer it. That is another can of worms.

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 10 points 1 year ago

Fully agree, I was just trying to keep it relevant to Google. All that shit needs to be dropped. As people realize that rather than free, all that shit is really expensive, maybe they'll make a move.

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 24 points 1 year ago

the 10% sounds like bait. Once they've got everyone on board and things are running smoothly (for them), it will be muuuch harder to resist.

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 46 points 1 year ago

And what happens when they decide to revoke that 5-10% after they got everyone onboard?

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 21 points 1 year ago

Not the Internet, that is neutral. It is only one large corp that is trying to control the Internet. If everyone boycotts them, then they will fail.

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 4 points 1 year ago

Just keep dropping Google shit and recommending to others.Critical mass will be hit at some point. There are too many smart and capable people in the world to succumb to a Google world.

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago

It is ironic, but the Pixel is good piece of hardware. So you discard the crap (Google software) and keep what is good (the hardware). That is the way forward. Discard chrome, keep Chromium or Brave for example.

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah thanks, it was quite confusing. Maybe a little note on the interface. Do you know where I could make this suggestion?

14
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by opt9@feddit.ch to c/lemmy_support@lemmy.ml

When I go to a community page (not signed in) I see thousands of subscribers, but when I access the community from within my account, I am shown dramatically less subscribers. I am a new convert from Reddit and don't understand what is going on.

Another community I wanted to join with 1.5k subscribers and lots of posts, came up as zero subscribers and no posts when I searched for and went when signed in. It showed that it was the correct community page, but nothing there.

Am I on a bad server?

screenshot

4
No posts (feddit.ch)
submitted 1 year ago by opt9@feddit.ch to c/librewolf@lemmy.ml

Hi, it's very strange, I found your page with posts and it said 1.5k subscribers, and when I joined I am presented with an empty community (0 subscribers) and no posts. I checked many times that I am in the right place so maybe I did something else wrong?

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 59 points 1 year ago

Google controls way too much. People need to stop using their products. Many people complaining right now are still using Google stuff. If everyone concerned stop using Google stuff, that would cause them to reconsider very quickly.

14
submitted 1 year ago by opt9@feddit.ch to c/privacyguides@lemmy.one

I'm wondering if it isn't better to just whitelist cookies for the sites I need to log into and not bother with a password manager extension (keepasxc or bitwarden). I try to keep the number of extensions in my browser to a minimum to lower the attack surface. And why involve one more entity in the password story? Are there any problems with using the (1st party) cookies of sites I have signed up to and use to keep me signed in?

view more: next ›

opt9

joined 1 year ago