51

The protocol is built from the same digital DNA as the Tor browser and the chat app Signal and will be used to create new ways for folks to communicate, share files, and generally surf the web while simultaneously protecting their privacy.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] briongloid@aussie.zone 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the browser is based on Tor & the messaging app Signal, why shouldn't we use these existing and established originals.

[-] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

One of the complaints about Signal is that although the content is encrypted end to end, the sender and receiver are in the open. This is analogous to a postal service letter where the contents are unviewable. Signal now offers something to obscure the sender (like not putting a return address on a letter), but the receiver must be known to the servers in order to properly deliver it.

Although the Signal protocol is probably sent to the Signal servers encrypted, privacy enthusasts contend that it's possible that the maintainers of Signal could be coerced into providing the sender and receiver of messages, even if the messages are not viewable.

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago

Signal has much work to do to be a real "privacy" app. Get rid of phone numbers, get rid of metadata, stop contact mining. They say they don't mine contacts but it is easy for them to do if they wanted to, so I assume they do.

Tor is great but has speed issues and no udp, so no voip. A lot of room for improvement there also. We should welcome all that try to improve on what we have.

[-] chingadera@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I have a question, I can likely look this up but I also want to start engaging in this sub if that's even what's these communities are called. If it forces the use of Tor, does that endpoint not also act as a node that would balance our the speed issue for Tor by adding more processing power and bandwidth?

[-] opt9@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago

I think Tor is kind of stuck as it is. To really fix it's issues, a new system needs to be built from scratch. Until then we'll be working with patches and hacks.

[-] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

Probably because a phone number isn't required!?

[-] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fuck. I'd even trust a group named like that with my life.

Maybe I missed it, but I have a couple questions. (1) if it's based on Signal, how does it not use phone numbers? I thought Whisper doesn't allow this sort of implementation. (2) is it compatible with Signal? As in, can I be on this, while my friends are on Signal, and still be able to communicate?

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
51 points (96.4% liked)

Privacy

31609 readers
512 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS