pivot_root

joined 2 years ago
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

5.6% of [respondents] users said they wouldn't pre-order [on Epic] knowing it would influence exclusivity, 2.7% said they would.

They really brought in those big dollars with making Borderlands 3 a timed exclusive on Epic. A whole 9%. Meanwhile, 91.6% of respondents preferred Steam. Bravo, Randy. Bravo.

Disappointingly, 53.9% still would buy it on Steam if it influenced exclusivity going forward. Even if it is Steam—which has a record of providing better service than its competitors—exclusivity helps nobody.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

GOG being pushed out of the market. They're one of the only stores that actually give you ownership of your games, and they don't have the same indomitable foothold that Steam does.

It would be all too easy for Microsoft to strangle one of their key markets by taking a loss on sales and offering publishers 150% sales price in exchange for exclusive distribution of 90s and 2000s era PC games or console ports.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Steam will end up pushed out of the market

This has been explicitly attempted 3 times already, and that really didn't work out well for anybody who tried it.

Epic Games Store still resorts to bribing people with free games to keep their monthly active user numbers up, hemorrhaging money to attract users who are rarely interested in anything more than freebies.

EA and Ubisoft tried to forgo Steam releases in favor of their own stores and launchers in an attempt to keep 100% of the revenue. They eventually relented, releasing their games on Steam again. Even Blizzard joined in, adding Diablo 4 and Overwatch 2 to Steam.

And Microsoft's attempt to dethrone Steam by releasing games through the Windows app store just ended up with Valve funneling considerable resources into helping Linux and WINE become a viable alternative to Windows for gaming.

Unless Valve enshittifies or legal shenanigans ensue, they're pretty unlikely to be pushed out of the market. No single game or game series is good enough to capture the entire market of Steam users and permanently drive them to alternative platforms. On top of that, Steam has a huge following of users who are loyal to the company, which is both insane and insanely hard to compete against.

or they will also become Streaming Platforms

Maybe, maybe not. I don't see it happening, though. Valve makes money hand over fist from digital sales alone, and they have more to lose in pissing off their customers by selling subscriptions than they have to gain by selling subscriptions.

I am concerned about GOG and PC hardware prices, though.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I can give it a try.

We're going to make America great again. Not great, VERY great. Tremendously great. Great economy, great people, great science.

Science today, it's not great. All these WOKE theories and hyperthees. That's not science, that's wasted money. The scientists today, they take our money. They give it to Harvard, woke Harvard. Spend it on DEI, not SCIENCE. They're cheating, taking advantage of HARD WORKING Americans. We don't pay them to ask questions. I KNOW science, that's NOT science. We tell them to do science, they don't DO science. They do SOME science, then they do it AGAIN, asking for money. That's FRAUD.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Linux isn't derived from Unix, just originally based on it. The BSDs and Darwin (Mac) would be the unfortunate casualties, but at least most of the country won't be stuck with Windows?

Edit: And, I guess, Nintendo Switch and PlayStation 4/5. The former "borrowed" the networking stack from OpenBSD, and the latter are based on some BSD variant if I recall correctly.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Modern Satanists are actually extremely progressive. The Satanic Temple makes a point of using legislation intended to promote Christianity to promote their own religious organization.

It pisses off the reactionary religious zealots and shows them to be hypocrites, and there's nothing legislators can do about it without blatantly giving preferential treatment to the "correct" religion.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I actually wouldn't put it past them to help bulldoze the entire planet to make an intergalactic highway if it meant they'd get Earth money in exchange. They're already doing that with the environment, so...

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's pretty commendable that you're trying to educate that person. I wouldn't have even bothered since it's clear that they're asking questions in bad faith.

Paraphrasing it:

So you believe in Satan? That's stupid.

And

So you're atheist? With useless extra steps, too.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Hail Satan!

Jokes aside, it's good to see more Satanists out in the wild. TST has been doing great shit, and I'm all here for it.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Point one is that he promotes the idea that the second American Revolution will be "bloodless" only if the left allows it to be

Fuck this asshole. "It won't hurt if you don't resist" isn't a civil war, it's a hostile coup led by jackboot-supported fascists.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It's not that everyone owns a gun, but that some people own a lot of guns. And it just so happens to be that those people support this kind of government tyranny.

It would be a very different story if the "tyranny" was punishing people for hate speech. That would be the wrong people being hurt, and that's unacceptable.

view more: ‹ prev next ›