-6
submitted 11 months ago by qnick@lemmy.world to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
2
submitted 11 months ago by qnick@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The phone number is +972 50-341-0322

The telegram account is @gaza_saver

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago

What choice did they realistically have?

Victim blaming as it is. The choice was not to murder people.

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

I actually encountered a cougar on a trail a week ago. So fucking scary. It's huge.

6
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by qnick@lemmy.world to c/videos@lemmy.world

Interview with Thames TV, 1970

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Biden will be alright. Who would be fucked is US.

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Putin just got an unexpected ally.

6
submitted 11 months ago by qnick@lemmy.world to c/narrow@lemmy.world

Chicago US, Nov 02 2023

-21
submitted 11 months ago by qnick@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

In this NBC interview Hamas spokesperson said that he likes to see all those protests among western world, and this is a good result of the October 7th attack.

How does that make you feel?

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Well, the original source is Russia Today, which is arguably worse. Reuters and BBC didn't happen to take an interview with this person during his Moscow visit.

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 61 points 11 months ago

Charles Whitman — Texas Sniper. Killed 14 people in 1966. Autopsy found a brain tumor pressing the amygdala, which presumably caused uncontrollable "fight or flight" response.

62
submitted 11 months ago by qnick@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Abu Marzouk, one of Hamas leaders, after visiting Moscow:

we look at Russia as our closest friend

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

That's interesting considering that Hamas is one of the closest allies of the Kremlin.

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

Nobody name their new product Gitler for some reason. Such a good name.

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

"Kill your masters" T-shirts and bumper stickers are already a thing. I wonder how long it'll take to see similar stuff for landlords.

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
305
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by qnick@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

Safety island in a middle of high speed avenue, beg buttons and flowers in a memory of the previous victim.

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Prigozhin allegedly had a massive influence on 2016 USA elections with his troll farms.

I don't think Kremlin gave up on the 2024 elections, it's just now they have Musk.

-1
Term: Values (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by qnick@lemmy.world to c/narrow@lemmy.world

In social science, Value is simply what individuals or societies consider "good". There's an entire field of philosophy studying values, called Axiology. Why study values? Because they affect our behavior.

In the picture above, you can see the results of the latest World Values Survey, which is conducted every 5 years by an international organization founded by Ronald Inglehart back in 1981. Each country on this map is a point in a two-dimensional space, where the vertical axis represents traditional vs secular values, and the horizontal axis represents survival vs self-expression, sometimes referred to as safety vs freedom.

Here's an explanation of these terms from the original website:

Traditional values emphasize the importance of religion, parent-child ties, deference to authority, and traditional family values. People who embrace these values also reject divorce, abortion, euthanasia, and suicide. These societies have high levels of national pride and a nationalistic outlook.

Secular-rational values have the opposite preferences to the traditional values. These societies place less emphasis on religion, traditional family values, and authority. Divorce, abortion, euthanasia, and suicide are seen as relatively acceptable. (Suicide is not necessarily more common.)

Survival values place emphasis on economic and physical security. It is linked with a relatively ethnocentric outlook and low levels of trust and tolerance.

Self-expression values give high priority to environmental protection, growing tolerance of foreigners, gays and lesbians, gender equality, and rising demands for participation in decision-making in economic and political life.

NB: If, after reading these explanations, you conclude that traditional is bad and secular is good, this is only because your personal values appear to be at the secular end. In reality, this is way more complicated.

In traditional societies, people recognize themselves as a part of the community more than as individuals. As a result, they trust each other and don't trust institutions. For example, if you need to borrow some amount of money, it would be easier to ask your friends and relatives than to go to a bank for a loan.

In secular societies, it's the other way around. People feel more competitive and trust each other less. Community support there is replaced by institutions.

8
Term: Socialism (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by qnick@lemmy.world to c/narrow@lemmy.world

The understanding of Socialism varies so widely among different people, that I genuinely struggled with this post. There are numerous political and economic theories, philosophies, and movements that encompass this term. Here are just a few examples

The only common element across all these systems is the idea of social ownership of the means of production. Some of the theories reject private property entirely, while others support a mixed economy.

The differences between types of socialism can be illustrated with modern-day Venezuela and Norway. Both countries are quite socialist, characterized by high taxes, free healthcare, and abundant oil resources. However, life in these countries is very different.

Today, nearly every European country has a socialist party in parliament. Most of them represent social democracy ideology.

6
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by qnick@lemmy.world to c/narrow@lemmy.world

This book describes six years of observations on a colony of chimpanzees living in an outdoor enclosure at the Arnhem Zoo in the Netherlands, conducted by Dutch primatologist Frans de Waal and his graduate students. The story of an aging patriarch and younger pretenders undermining his power. Violence and peace, sex and status, like the early seasons of "Game of Thrones", but documentary.

For all politicians this book is a "must-read".

Book: Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes by Frans de Waal

6
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by qnick@lemmy.world to c/narrow@lemmy.world

The Legal Equality is the idea that all people shall be equal before the law.

Most of the countries, though, implemented this idea in a Rule of Law form, which states that all citizens, or members of society, should have equal rights. So technically it allows some individuals to be excluded from the definition of "members of society," leading to the deprivation of their basic human rights.

This loophole has been widely exploited by various governments to enact oppressive laws targeting specific groups of people. Perhaps the most notorious example is Nazi Germany and its anti-Jewish legislation.

During the Nuremberg trials the defendants argued that they didn't commit any crimes, because they followed the German law at the time. To oppose that argument, the court used Radbruch formula, created by German law professor Gustav Radbruch. According to this formula, if a law "deliberately disregards" human equality before the law, it must not be followed.

Today, the Radbruch formula is embedded into most civil law systems worldwide, making it illegal to dehumanize people and evade accountability. It's worth noting that the legal systems of the USA and Canada operate differently, and I couldn't find any mentions of the formula in those jurisdictions.

-1
Term: Communism (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by qnick@lemmy.world to c/narrow@lemmy.world

Communism is known as another totalitarian ideology, but its roots lie in early Christianity with their idea of the second coming and establishing the eternal Kingdom of God.

After the discovery of the New World, the idea got a new life in the form of an imaginary island called Utopia with no private property, no locks on houses, identical clothing, and everyone having two slaves.

With the Industrial Revolution, communism appeared as a reaction to the visible inequality between workers and business owners. This inequality had existed for centuries, but before urbanization, it was not visible to the peasants.

As you can see, the famous ten points of marxism along with abolition of private property strongly suggest the centralization of power, which might contradict with some other communist concepts, such as disappearance of the State

  1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
  2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
  3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.
  4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
  5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
  6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
  7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
  8. Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
  9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
  10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.

Another common feature of Communism and Utopia is opposition to urbanism. According to these ideas, people should not live in cities but in small agricultural communities, basically suburbs.

[-] qnick@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago
view more: next ›

qnick

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF