swicano

joined 2 years ago
[–] swicano@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

I can't believe you posted the ending, I was barely past the A-pillar!

Also is this some car version of tits-ass-or-legs thing I'm not carpilled enough to appreciate?

[–] swicano@programming.dev 60 points 5 days ago (5 children)

We've tried nothing and we're all our of ideas!

Gtfo, if you want to eliminate crunch, just don't have them work more than 40 hours. It's easy accept that youre gonna miss some deadlines, cause you fucked up the planning. Promise your workers triple pay during OT and suddenly the middle managers ain't as motivated to try to force unofficial OT

[–] swicano@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Connections

Puzzle #920

🟪🟪🟪🟪

🟨🟨🟨🟨

🟩🟩🟩🟩

🟦🟦🟦🟦

The purple was pretty mean, but the blue was the first thing I saw.

[–] swicano@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You know they're proud of how the product looks because it's always back-lit or in shadow

Though I do honestly love the little bike wheels it has

[–] swicano@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] swicano@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Wait until he learns that physics is just theoretical chemistry

[–] swicano@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The video I saw was saying cat into grep is totally fine in day to day life do whatever comes out of your fingertips naturally, but if you're making a bash script for others to use, use grep args because cat pipe grep can do some strange stuff with error handling. Which I have no experience with, but sounds reasonable

[–] swicano@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Oh cool, I'll check it out!

[–] swicano@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Interesting, I will have to try that sometime, when I only want part of a file committed I do an awkward stash, apply, revert individual lines dance then commit, then stash apply again. This seems much easier

[–] swicano@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

I agree with that first quoted person that "the cost of proper cybersecurity is not $0 and that means small business have more costs" but I'm not sure I see how lawmakers are going to make cybersecurity easier for small businesses. I guess they could give Microsoft a bunch of money to provide discounted malware protection? That's the terrible idea assume they're going to go with, but realistically, how can you possibly secure 80,000 small businesses' IT networks without the business incurring some expense?

[–] swicano@programming.dev 13 points 2 weeks ago

It's all steamdeckers. They're using the power of portability.

[–] swicano@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

If ive done the math right, the previous owner was averaging around 40,000 km/year that seems awfully high. Was this a Uber or delivery driver vehicle?

view more: next ›