tatterdemalion
The "you don't even celebrate" felt pretty snarky to me. Like it even matters whether or not you celebrate the same holidays.
The snark is really not warranted. If you can't survive for a single holiday by yourself, you need to get your shit together.
Flash is actually coming back to life via WebAssembly of all things.
Please explain how my comment implied that in any way.
EDIT: So if I'm understanding you right, you're saying that you believe (even if only for the sake of argument) that other people are a "part of you" in such a way that you can't know things about them that they already know about themselves.
If so, I don't think that really changes the ethical problem. So what if you believe that you'd only be harming "yourself"? You still can't prove this, and so acting on that belief to do harm to others without guilt would be unjustified.
I mean, that's easy to disprove because I can tell you plenty of things you don't know about me.
I disagree. You are assuming that everyone who harms someone else does not care whether they are conscious or not, but there are certainly people who reconsider their actions when given the opportunity to reflect about their victim's life. It's called empathy.
Did you read the post? It ends with several critiques of Rust.
And that makes it OK?
It's a dangerous belief from an ethical standpoint. You could use it to justify horrible acts against others without any proof about their sentience.
No the dollar membership would be too expensive.
It's such a weird poster. You can tell they photoshopped two separate photos of the actors together.