thedirtyknapkin

hmm, I'm autistic and i learned that you don't have to bring it up when a joke doesn't make logical sense pretty young. as an autist, i find that shit annoying. especially when it's dudebros pointing out "that's not how guns work" in every movie ever.

so like creeps on Instagram model pages? or people that argue politics in comments? both?

i mean... we saw parts of them that we don't normally. there's even a taboo around seeing those parts. taboo is the heart of many fetishes.

I'm not going i argue the symantics of what "intimate" means. the point is that the beach is a sexual place for certain.

i have been intimate with many of my friends. much of it starts at the beach lol.

what's a reply guy?

don't forget the shame. the wrongness of it is very much part of it. like, most people think feet are kind of gross, so it feels taboo to like them. taboo is one of the strongest things in fetishes. "this is so wrong/dirty" is a powerful thought for the horny mind.

honestly, if/when society becomes more accepting of foot fetishes i bet that will actually decrease the number of people that have one. if society stops shaming them it likely won't get them off the same way.

yes lol. have you seen a bikini? that's explicitly intimate and provocative. it's the most naked you're allowed to be in public without people calling you out.

beaches are often considered inherently sexual places. like "Beach episode" is synonymous with fan service.

kind of, it's more like it starts a geralt's story, but becomes ciri's story. the first two books are all geralt. after that it's about geralt and ciri's relationship. then by the last book we barely even see geralt.

then after the series was finished he started writing more little stories from earlier in geralt's life.

as i said in another comment. it's downright bizarre that ciri doesn't get mentioned until the third game. she almost makes more sense as the protag anyway.

no, but she kind of wanted to... but it's also way more fucked than that. please don't make me type it out here. I'll just say it involves violent rape while she's still under age. it could be construed as a trauma response, but it's debatable... I'm not convinced that sapkowski would have known what a trauma response was when he wrote that scene in the.... 90s?

can't actuality remember which book that happened in.

oh yeah, it's been a while. details at foggy.

anyone who has read the books was likely surprised that ciri wasn't the main character of any of the games when they first started coming out :::especially since geralt dies at the end of the books :::

ciri was more the mc than geralt for most of the books. she's the child of destiny. she's the young character that grows up as we follow their journey. she's the one that finds herself and shows major character development throughout the books. the only character development geralt goes through is accepting his bond with ciri.

the first two games never mentioning ciri was outright bizarre tbh. only even remotely possibly because geralt lost his memory. like, with where geralt as at by the end of the books the only thing you could possibly expect him to do on regaining his memory is frantically search for signs of his adopted daughter

to a longtime book reader my reaction to ciri being the protag of the next game was "FINALLY"

my only curiosity at this point is how much she'll be like book ciri. does she know magic? in the books ciri goes to sorceress school and then gets trained in primal magic by unicorns and immortal space elves. can you fuck a horse? that was one of the more... questionable scenes in the book.

tangent: sapkowski's politics occasionally bleed through in weird ways in the books. like three's a scene where a woman finds out she's pregnant mid way through a literal war that our band wades through on their journey to save the world. the party basically needs the woman to proceed. she does not want the child. i believe it was the product of rape. yet for some reason geralt and a literal fucking vampire convince her that abortion is wrong and she should keep it instead of drinking a potion about it. it was so randomly out of character for everyone involved. but hey, that's catholics for you i guess... /tangent

i think they generally said that ciri lost her elder blood powers after the king of the hunt was killed right? otherwise I'm gonna be really curious how handle that as well. she should be sort of the world's greatest sorceress otherwise. ooh, i wonder if she'll make quips about cyberpunk and/or other worlds she's traveled to. like, she spent Decent bit of time in Arthurian legend. she shows up briefly in Victorian London.

also, what will the world at large look like? they can't do it like the last time where your previous save could alter the new game based on your decisions. you were simply able to do too much. they'd need to make like 3 entirely separate stories at the very least. like, who rules the north? are you the empress of nilfguard? is the church burning all the nonhumans at record pace? you can basically decide the entire fate of the northern realms and all of its people in multiple ways... unless it just takes place elsewhere. maybe we'll be in zerrikania this time or some shit. there are many distant lands that the games never take us. it would be much more doable that way. then you'd just have to change dialogue and maybe swap out a few characters.

aaaanyway... yeah, anyone mad about her being the mc is a dumbass that doesn't know shit about the story.

yes, but there's a pretty big gap between unhealthy and insane.

is it healthy to become addicted to cigarettes? no. is it unusual or insane? also no. I may not understand how a person can look at all the downside of cigarettes and decide to smoke them anyway, but they're not insane.