355
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

One of multiple live bullets found on the set of “Rust” by investigators of the 2021 fatal shooting was discovered in the bandolier of actor Jensen Ackles, according to crime scene technician Marissa Poppell.

Poppell disclosed the detail while on the stand during the second day of testimony in the involuntary manslaughter trial of actor Alec Baldwin, nearly three years after cinematographer Halyna Hutchins was fatally shot on the New Mexico set of the Western film.

Asked about the live rounds of ammunition that were discovered on set, Poppell said investigators found some on a prop cart, in a box of ammo and also in two prop gun holsters — the one worn by Alec Baldwin and another worn by co-star Ackles.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 138 points 1 month ago

This case has been going on for a while. Offhand, I can think of at least three toddlers who killed themselves or someone else using a gun that the owner knew was loaded.

None of those adults has been arrested. But the guy who was told his gun had blanks is responsible?

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 56 points 1 month ago

I think it’s bc he is also a producer. The case hinges on him being responsible for safety of the crew and being repeatedly negligent.

[-] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

This one is his negligence trial, in the trial about him as a producer it came out that he was also messing around with the gun on set and had fired blanks at the crew between takes among other unsafe behaviors.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Jesus christ, firing blanks is still dangerous. If there is an obstruction in the barrel it can still act like a projectile.

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

One of ten producers. And the one who was mostly in charge fundraising.

The people who were actually in charge of safety and the guns told Baldwin it was safe.

[-] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

This is omitting the detail that members of the crew had brought up safety concerns about the firearms handlers and production went on.

They had an inexperienced armorer on set raising all sorts of red flags, production was made aware, show went on.

Baldwin is on set when many producers probably weren't. He's got his fair shame of blame in this, and the armorer as well.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Exactly this. People forgot, or dont know, that safety concerns were raised before the accident.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

So it's not exactly about the shooting itself but creating the negligent conditions that allowed it to happen. From what I understand, as a producer he had his crew cut as many safety corners as possible to reduce costs. His direction to cut corners led to oversights in safety, which led to the prop masters making safety mistakes and accidentslly loading a live round into a firearm designated as a prop, which led to a person dying because of an on set accident. If he didn't direct his crew to cut corners, the chances of somebody dying is dramatically reduced and makes this line of work incredibly safe despite the potentially dangerous implements used.

So the case is about "did the executive decisions Baldwin make to cut corners on safety contribute to the death of someone on set?"

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Again, I point out that parents of children who killed/died aren't being held to the same level of responsibility.

[-] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

They should be. Is that your point? That they should be, because I think any sane person would agree.

If you're arguing that the responsible parties in this incident shouldn't be prosecuted because another person is getting away with manslaughter… well that's a bit silly isn't it?

I can't tell what your intentions are, because nuance is hard via text

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

Not to derail but I just want to say that this is an impeccably crafted and balanced comment.

[-] Nyxon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I spotted it too, it is well reasoned with an excellent flow of thought. I appreciate that others see it too and commented on it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yes they should be, now leave the non sequitur discussion derailing nonsense at the door and stay on topic. Parents being irresponsible dumbasses has nothing to do with a film exec directing his crew to cut safety corners to save a quick buck.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It sounds like you are saying that unless we prosecute EVERY OTHER case on this issue, we should just forget about it?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Not really relevant for this topic though

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] drdalek@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

If you want logic from American gun culture, you better get comfortable waiting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Baldwin made fun of Trump a bunch of times on SNL. It had already been ruled involuntary manslaughter, but maga court had a bone to pick.

Additionally - a *half truth from chat frickin GPT:

"In a tense political climate, Alec Baldwin's satirical portrayal of President Donald Trump on "Saturday Night Live" had garnered significant attention and polarized opinions. His impersonations were both celebrated and criticized, drawing ire from Trump supporters who saw his performances as disrespectful and damaging.

On the set of the film "Rust," an unfortunate and tragic accident occurred, leading to the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins. As investigations began, initial findings suggested that the incident was a result of a series of safety lapses and negligence on the part of the production team, including Baldwin, who was both an actor and a producer on the film.

Enter District Attorney Thomas Harlan, a staunch supporter of President Trump, appointed during Trump's tenure. Harlan had previously expressed disdain for Baldwin's portrayals of Trump, believing them to be part of a broader media conspiracy against conservative values.

Seizing the opportunity presented by the "Rust" incident, Harlan decided to press charges against Baldwin with unusual fervor. He argued that Baldwin's role as a producer made him directly responsible for the safety lapses on set, thus filing charges of involuntary manslaughter against him. Critics claimed that the intensity and speed of the charges were disproportionate compared to similar cases in the industry, suggesting political motivations behind Harlan's actions.

Supporters of Baldwin and various legal analysts argued that the charges were a clear case of political retribution. They pointed out that other individuals with similar roles in previous on-set accidents had not faced such severe charges. Furthermore, they highlighted Harlan's public statements and connections to pro-Trump groups as evidence of his bias.

The media frenzy intensified, with pundits on both sides debating whether Baldwin was being unfairly targeted due to his political satire. This scenario underscores the complexities of mixing legal actions with political motivations, ultimately raising questions about the impartiality of justice in a highly polarized environment."

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 111 points 1 month ago
  1. What is live ammo doing on the set period
  2. What is the prop master doing? (Was there even one?)
[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 month ago

The arms master has already been charged. No one really knows why live ammo was on set besides it was mixed into the blanks they bought and the arms master didn’t check properly.

[-] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

I thought the arms master made her own blanks or some other dumb shit.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 46 points 1 month ago

Nah, she brought real bullets for shooting tin cans during downtime.

[-] yeather@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

Even worse then, she is directly responsible for not making them blanks.

[-] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

You might be getting confused with the circumstances around Brandon Lee's death on the set of the Crow, which makes sense since that has been a hot topic when discussing the situation on Rust's set. As I understand it, in the case of Lee's death, they had taken live rounds and "converted" them to dummy rounds by removing the bullets, dumping out the gunpowder from the cartridge, and then reinstalling the bullets. However, they did not remove the primer from the cartridges, because they wanted the bottom of the cases to look pristine for shots where the revolver was loaded.

At some point, one of these "dummy" (but still very much not inert, thanks to the primer) rounds was accidentally fired. Because they had removed the propellent, only the primer detonated. This provided enough force to dislodge the bullet from the case, but not enough to expel it out the barrel. No one checked the barrel before a blank was loaded into weapon for the scene where Lee's character was shot. Blank detonated, dummy bullet is dislodged, Lee is killed.

So, while both productions are staggering examples of safety protocol failures on film sets, the circumstances are differ in the details.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 11 points 1 month ago

The prop master was doing coke and shooting live rounds out of these guns during breaks for fun.

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

Why can't they use specially made guns for Hollywood. Like, you won't be able to fit real ammo in these weapons to begin with. Let me guess, money. They don't want to spend the money.

[-] Stubborn9867@lemmy.jnks.xyz 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I just saw where Guy Ritchie exclusively used air soft guns on The Covenant because it was right after this.

[-] Hobo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

That would've changed Bullet Tooth Tony's speech a bit I guess. "And the fact that you've got Replica written down the side of your guns... Oh and mine does too because this is a movie and we all need to be safe."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

If we can make Han Solo shoot second....

Surely we can green screen a wooden prop into a real gun.

I'll even volunteer for the sound effects.

Pew Pew Pew Pew zip Pew pew

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah I wondered the exact same thing. Seems like an easy solution.

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

Look, that was only there in case he or his similarly hot brother has to kill a demon.

[-] midnight_puker@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago

Give me a break. Dean is way hotter than Sam and it ain't even close.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Was it a silver bullet?

Might have been a werewolf problem on set, is all I'm saying 🤷

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

But did they check whether Dean’s was a silver bullet?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
355 points (98.4% liked)

News

22470 readers
4763 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS