themachine

joined 2 years ago
[–] themachine@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

This is probably unnecessary. The powder itself should be very shelf stable so I would have just repackaged it in vacuumed sealed bags or get an attachment to vacuum seal the jars (vs heat canning).

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Apologies for the long delay. I was using just the browser via your docker image but today I've done some testing with the electeon app.

Wonderful that you added PTT but it's implementation has a flaw as the Peersuite window MUST be in focus for the PTT key to be read.

As far as the video goes, I've definitely confirmed that there's is some serious frame drop which I'm assuming is directly related to the bitrate in same way. I had a friend on windows use the electron app and share his screen while I watched from the electron app on Linux. I took the following recording to better demonstrate what I'm saying. The quality has gone through multiple transcodes now but that's not really important as the framerate is what I'm referring to anyway. https://files.catbox.moe/03f5b1.mkv

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Perhaps talking about bitrate wasn't correct of me. After looking at this again image quality itself is actually pretty good but the framerate is a different story.

To provide context, I used it to share the video game I was playing as my friends that use discord tell me they primarily stick to it for its screen sharing capability which they use when gaming.

I'm not sure how to best test this and provide metrics to you if this is improvable or even something you care about.

To attempt to take the connection factor out of the equation I opened two browser windows and viewed my own screen share from a different username and even then the framerate is not great.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

Well hell I may stand this up tonight. My only question is does the voice chat support push-to-talk?

Edit: Ok, gave it a spin. It does not support push-to-talk but being fully browser based I don't think that's a trivial thing to implement anyway.

That said, this is pretty sweet though certainly still rudimentary. I was really looking forward to the screen sharing but my friend on the other end said the quality and framerate were pretty bad. Not sure what flexibility there is as far as adjustable bit rate and framerate with what you're doing but I'll definitely be keeping my eye on this project.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

True though that's less server operator and more "just being helpful to your mom". That said it seems nowadays that a Jellyfin app is available on most devices/ecosystems (or maybe I just don't have experience with enough devices to have an accurate idea).

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Jellyfin is a fully self hosted drop in. That means it's up to the server operator to handle everything. You would still tell your mom to just install the Jellyfin app on her TV with the one additional step in your server address which you would tell her.

But yes, you as the operator have to do some extra things like implementating a reverse proxy and if hosting out of your home make necessary network configuration changes to accommodate this access.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No i mean instead of OpenVPN i would recommend you look into using Tailscale. If you want to fully self host it then you can run the open source control plane called Headscale instead of relying on Tailscale's (the company) free service tier on their own control plane.

The Tailscale client and server are also open source.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You'll always have bots knocking on your doors. In general keep the doors locked and you are fine.

I highly recommend trying tailscale with headscale over openvpn.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is a somewhat native file editor in nextcloud but for your needs I would recommend setting up integration with either OnlyOffice or Collabora (LibreOffice). I am currently using OnlyOffice and while my utilization isn't much or often it seems to do what it should without any fuss.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Haven't had any issues whatsoever.

I've done nothing special regarding security and have it exposed to the public internet. I intend on having fail2ban look at its logs but I've not yet set that up (entirely out of laziness).

If you want to be very secure I would recommend having it entirely behind a VPN. I personally use tailscale+headscale for my internal only services but like I said I have Nextcloud publicly exposed as I want to be able to access it from potentially any device.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (17 children)

As far as the "what you want" stuff goes, Nextcloud can do all of it and I use it for exactly that.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (5 children)

That is not correct. A VPN would be one method but you can also just expose the service to the internet in a number of ways and accomplish the same thing Plex provides.

view more: next ›