[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 33 points 11 months ago

Everybody should write in me.

[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 27 points 11 months ago

Revelation 18;23: "(...)

For your merchants were the great ones of the earth,

because all the nations were deceived by your sorcery.”

24 And there was found in her the blood of prophets and saints, and of all who had been slain on the earth

[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 30 points 11 months ago

And thank you, wonderful poster

162
submitted 11 months ago by vomit_sounds@hexbear.net to c/memes@hexbear.net
19

I need it for a very edit I thought off, pleaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee bottom-speak

[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 35 points 11 months ago

I did an effort post about Syria's ba3th until 1970 in the replies to my other comment about Libya, if you are interested, check it out if you want: https://hexbear.net/comment/3914654

[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 31 points 11 months ago

I am pretty aware that I would be dead three times over in third world country by now, the point is though that the west tries to pass that off as its achievement, and not it causing the conditions that make ND trans people die in the third world. Maybe I'd be fine in Cuba, idk, I just hate queers who defend capitalism a bit more bc they are happy servants of an evil that kills their siblings and keeps them down extra hard

[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 41 points 11 months ago

Libya: Gaddafi's Green Book was more coherent than most people like to give it credit for. Was it very well written and a revolutionary theory that added to communism? No. Was it the insane ramblings of a mad dictator? Also no. There is a bunch of orientalism which made all the scholars switch off their brains, but Gaddafi bases his Third Universal Theory on the assumption that there has been too much abstraction and mediation from a natural state of things, which he refers to consistently throughout his books. this is the ideational foundation for his approach to direct democracy, for example. He was still a believer in development etc, so it is pretty wrong to say he espouses a "primitivist" worldview or something orientalist like that.

There might be some arguments about a "naturalist" point of view he takes, but being an oil exporting and consuming country, it is obviously silly to think he was an environmentalist.

Mu3ammar al-Gaddafi, actually al-Qadhdhâfî ("softer" th, Q comes from the back of your throat, î is a long vowel) was very flexible, which he had to be. He took power 1969 by taking leadership of a group of officers that styled themselves in the image of Naser, calling themselves the Free Officer (ad-dubbat al-ahrar) and establishing similar bodies after throwing out the western proxy Idris as-Sanousi who was a far cry from his grandfather, the founder of the Sanousiyya, a sufi order that lead the anti-italian-action fight.

Originally, he had no desire to rule Libya as its own state, which was divided between Tripoli in the West and Cyrenaica in the East as well as independ tribes in the South. Being a good Nasserite, he wanted it annexed to Egypt under Naser, whom he saw as his personal hero. Tragically, Naser died and al-Gaddafi did not like Sadat at all, so he decided to do his own thing. His position was very precarious. Libya was underdeveloped, had little national identity, neither pan-arab nor Libyan, both the USA and the USSR kind of liked and kind of didn't like him, there were internal power struggles in the ruling comitee as well, which Gaddafi won by virtue of his charisma and stubbornness. After a lot of experimentation and getting rid of rivals, he solidified his rule enough to be more or less the guy people turned to for questions. His politics put him closer to the USSR than to the US, even though he never cut ties with anybody or joined a camp during the cold war.

He was kind of a guy out of his time, having come to power after the Naksa (set-back) 1968 whose effects on the pan-arab movement are hard to convey in a few words, but basically, the hopes that the ba3th and Nasser would manage to turn the "backwards" arab states into socialist bastions of modernity were dashed, the PLO began to emerge as the hope for a lot of leftists for Arab independence and revolution in the Levante. al-Qaddafi was not impressed, holding on to the ideology for quite some time. Economic development was rocky at start, but his famously robust welfare program was probably not a bad call to hold onto power and achieve some form of national identity, considering the situation he was in. He also financed a lot of Palestinian groups. I am not knowledgeable enough to trace his involvement into the Lebanese Civil War starting 1975, but he did host the Abu Nidal group, which was just one of the worse palestinian groups, objectively speaking more busy killing Palestinians and random jews around the world than killing Israeli leadership, trying claim Arafat was a homosexual with AIDS and other gameresque shit.

He was pretty good at playing both the USSR and the USA for support for his country.

The Green Book is a reference to Mao's "Red Book". He published three parts, 1975, 1977, 1981, the first on Politics, the second on economics, the third on society at large. It's not long, go read it when bored. Most points you'll disagree with, but his point about sports was pretty agreeable to me. He famously received a visit from the German Greens 1982. https://www.marxists.org/subject/africa/gaddafi/index.htm

I can continue rambling on if you find this interessting, but I need to do irl stuff rn.

1
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by vomit_sounds@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net

Hi everyone,

I want to write more and hopefully get better, but I got really turned off from writing coms by what I heard and saw on Discord and reddit-logo. I am looking for a group where I don't receive unnecessarily caustic/bitter/passive-aggressive criticism for mistakes, especially since english is not my first language and I am probably not the most innovative/daring writer around (I just wanna write fantasy). If you need an example of stuff I take issue with, look at the r/writingcirclejerk mega and reccs for what turns me off.

I get that you have to show your stuff to other people eventually and get criticism for your mistakes, but I would prefer a space that is not so emotionally frustrating, lowkey to highkey transphobic/ableist etc etc. I get screamed at and have to deal with condescending assholes enough on the job/politics. I don't want that in something that is supposed to be FUN.

Do you have any recommendations for online groups or places that are relaxed, ND- and trans-friendly? They should still offer criticism and not white lie about things. Becoming "Better" means avoiding clear, objective mistakes, better structure, producing enjoyable, if not super groundbreaking works of fictions in the english language.

I don't want any "the world is hard, you have to be hard on yourself, you should suck it up" shit. There has to be a less gnarly way.

Thank you so much (insert unobtrusive, yet friendly heart emoji here)

[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago

I have to admit that I only knew that Hamilton was a slave owner and that he is played by a black guy. I didn't even know he raps.

[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago

Since everything worthwhile has been said

vehicular-manslaughter

73

to be fair, they also talked about other musicals i didnt care about, but I wasn't feeling it, lmao. i would have been happy with literally any other topic, but i fall asleep during this shit, cant help it

1

I had like an interaction where I had some decent clues that a person only introduces their pronouns after they clocked me, e.g. other people didn't do pronoun intro before, the way the "ally in question" did it felt pretty artificial (I am willing to write that off on being paranoid).

The message is "I know you are trans, you are not passing, but I am graciously allowing you to exist in this group setting". Same goes for only doing pronoun checks in a group setting when you clock a trans person. I find it worse than assuming wrong pronouns and switching after being gently corrected. Maybe because I have higher standards of would-be allies than the average person. After all, allies are supposed to have my back, not just not having a hitler-detector moment when I pass by. On the other hand, I have it easy for being okay with being a semi-binary trans woman, so obv enby struggles are another thing, but clocking still stings like a bitch.

Pronoun checks should be normalized to a point cis people do it intuitively, but idk if we will ever get there. If you wanna chime in, when and how did you call that behaviour out or point it out, if you saw it? Did your response work?

[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

"Have you considered C I V I L I T Y?"

[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago

I want to feel yung, this goes to an insta next to pics of me with upskirt

[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago

jokerfied what do you get when you cross a mentally ill loner with a SOCIETY that ABANDONS HIM AND TREATS HIM LIKE TRASH?!

SpoilerSome good rants I hope

[-] vomit_sounds@hexbear.net 161 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To the reddit refugee, liberals, whatever: Your system is evil. You may not notice it because you are a cozy Labour aristocrat (even if doing "manual" labor, lmao) mostly worried about your slice of the bloody fucking pie. One week as an out trans person sees more hate than you will ever experience, there is fucking blood on most of the things you consume for fun, ask yourself how you get this or that snazzy device you fucking uncaring roman. Ask yourself why bananas are cheaper than apples in North America, ask yourself why thousands of migrants drown in the fucking piss water you euro fucks skinny dip in, who fucking harvests your watery shit vegetables.

Look at the millionaire while he pretends he is your friend, listen to the pod, check your boxes, do your "polsci", read the virtual toilet rag editorials, shudder at the thought of fucked up, desperate people doing honest mistakes, fall for the lies, laugh at the Stalin quote about his heart of stone, then notice you don't even have anything close to a heart beating in your pilates toned, conscious living chest

Your system is rotten. Some of us honestily tried to fix it, but you wouldn't have it. Vote Blue if you think it saves you, you could at least admit you are being blackmailed by a duopoly. Europe: You couldn't even get out of the neoliberal shit if you wanted to. You are too stagnant and now you are falling to the guys you derided as untermensch, "uneducated", or "autocratic" (rich coming from you lmao)

I, personally, have no great hopes for china, though you might ask yourself why your "concern" is so focused on this country, while you never acted up before about any western injustice. But fuck you and fuck anything you stand for. We will not rush to save it. We hope to survive, at least some of us, despite of all your "help" and "efforts"

20
view more: next ›

vomit_sounds

joined 1 year ago