webghost0101

Haha “flanders”

Seriously, do you understand anything i am saying?

Defining OUR terms is a strawman argument counter to my point. OUR definitions are NOT the established definitions which you can read on wikipedia

Here those are: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence

I repeat in yet different words: My own definition of what intelligence is off topic. Trying to find a shared definition is off topic.

It’s about you telling people they cannot use the word ai. Because it does not match your personal definition.

My teacher was a bully.

I received detention exactly once in my life, in my final year at the last school week before my exams.

For entirely unjust reasons and to perform a task of finding certain information online i had previously tried in group and we concluded the information did not exist online. So i just fumbled my thumbs till i could go home.

She bullied other people of my class too. She also blamed us for being suicidal because idk the only reason she gave was her previous class had higher grades than us. I was actually suicidal at the time.

Sounds like a bad spot to be in. Do you have access to professional help?

My dad was an alcoholic. In rehab he/we where thought that at a certain point the person is no longer themselves but a monster who is stuck in a different kind of alcohol instinct.

Either way physical or emotional abuse is never ok. Don’t try to reason that it’s somehow not abuse and you deserve it. Making someone feel worthless about themselves is a red flag. The fact your wife poisons herself to a predictable negative result says she has not figured out life either.

How do you picture this?

As far as i know many people try to advertise Lemmy on reddit but those posts are getting removed.

Are you suggesting we should crowdsource funding for actual ads? It might work to get it to stay and have many people see it but i am conflicted in the sense i believe todays internet advertisement is inherently harmfull and i want no part of it.

I tend to do the much more efficient system of writing an entire essay to then decide to delete it before posting.

Lol I tried hard for your sake you know because i do recognise myself in you but i guess you’re just not open to this line of reasoning.

Have a good day!

To be fair have many people still been trying to improve on the technology or are we still using some ancient blueprint.

Avation science has come a long way.

Don't be childish

If this discussion is just for us 2 to decide on terms i would use my personal perspective of what intelligence is which differ vastly from the common sense definitions (which i believe is the wikipedia on it)

We could both try to discuss using those established definitions. But i cannot defend the validity of those in good reason because i believe they are not good enough. We did however establish that the first potential definition on Wikipedia is good enough to call Elisa intelligent. Which is different from it actually being so.

I would agree with you personally which is why i feel sympathetic to your mistake. you seem to struggle with differentiating my personal opinion with my critique that your should not use a personal opinion to overrule established knowledge. Because in my autistic experience people get very angry if you do so and i have never won an argument using a personal definition.

I can personally vouch that its medically impossible for me to remain focused for an entire lecture which is just a teacher talking

While online self learning has non of those benefits. I can control speed to get information before i get distracted. Can go back as much as i need to and often uses much more visual stimulation.

My teachers concluded i was just not motivated/interested in learning physics. Which is why i spend post education free time on learning physics for fun.

I also do not oppose them for those same reasons.

Also all of those reasons (except love hamas/hate jews), but not just because of those.

I am not sure there is a point to us deciding on terms because my entire point is that there is no single agreed definition of “intelligence”

And of the definitions we do have , ai fits some. I give you an example above from wikipedia. But there are many reasonable ways one can argue the current definition work. Regardless of that definition being actual correct.

I really like the example of how the turing test was considered proof a computer can think of a human. Which many computers now have and we keep having to change what we consider “thinking like a human”

Modern chatbots depending which one tend to be a combination of a mix of different llm models, non llm ai, a database, api accessible tools and a lot of code to bring it all together.

But if your a little tech savy you can just spin one up and build your own however you like.

Google actually has one that does not use an llm at all but diffusion generation instead. It creates the text output similar to how image generation creates a picture. Mind though i don't think this is much better but maybe combined it might be.