wizardbeard

joined 2 years ago
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's hidden in the middle of the description, but this is DoomRL after being told they had to stop using the Doom IP as a fangame. Same person behind it, and my understanding is that it's even built off the same codebase (just updated a hell of a lot over the years). So less a "spiritual successor" and more a rebranding.

Which is awesome if you like DoomRL.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is shockingly "public" considering there's legal proceedings now.

In another article or trailer it was explicitly stated that they worked with the community mod makers to package in all the "must have" texture and model mods. So it should look like what you previously could mod it into, lol.

I hope it does better than the last try.

In most public places in the US it is technically illegal to be publicly intoxicated. It's incredibly rare that anyone would do anything about it unless you're being a public nuisance or something though.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Bunch of disparate thoughts about this. Apologies.


You can't just purity test an entire profession. Or at least it isn't reasonable to do so.

You have to dig, but there are artists and authors out there who have positive opinions about AI. I'm sure the folks more active on !techtakes@awful.systems could get a list together of their favorite sneer targets.


All the anti-ai tools are coming from programmers. anubis, iocaine, nepenthes, nightshade, and more.


I'd suggest that it's worth remembering that a large portion of any online discourse is going to be made up of teenagers, college students, and people new to whatever it is they're discussing. But almost all of them will talk with an implied authority on whatever subject it is anyway. Many subs on reddit have done demorgraphics polls (or polls that included a question about age) and the results makes the sillier places like relationship advice make a hell of a lot more sense.

I have almost a decade of work experience in IT, more if you count some intro to programming teaching gigs I did. AI coding assistance tools are positioned perfectly to be like crack for early learners, but don't actually add too much value for more experienced folks (especially not anything can't be done faster with existing non-ai tools, like an IDE's code snippets features for repeated boilerplate code, which is the most frequent excuse I see online).

That said, I have literally never met any dev in real life that thinks favorably of AI coding assistance.

What I see more and more is corporate management types being afraid that all the hype for AI coming out of Gartner etc means that if they don't force their employees to use it they will get left behind as their competitors magically produce more somehow. At that point as an employee your choices are to work to meet whatever shit metric they've constructed or give up making a paycheck.

It's very easy to tell other people they need to be more principled when it's not your food/shelter/insurance/livelyhood on the line.

And it's also worth noting that what the current wave of popular AI (LLMs) does best is generate text. So of course you're going to see text posts online trying to shift the window. That's the company using their horrific tool as designed. There was evidence of AI bots hyping AI in the programming subs on reddit that got overshadowed by them shutting off third party API access.


AI is only as inevitable for as long as the megacorps can keep funneling money into the pit. The world leader in AI conpanies, OpenAI, is doing so great with money that they are trying to threaten their business partner Microsoft out of roughly $40B. This could all blow up fairly soon. I hope it does.


There absolutely are devs out there who are getting ground down, where there principles are becoming eroded over time.

But like with many things in life, the rabble at the bottom aren't the ones effecting real long term change, media coverage, corporate adoption, etc. Don't turn this into some crab pot situation.

Go after the tech reporters continually giving AI the benefit of the doubt. Go after industry steering publications like Gartner. Go after politicians giving AI projects sweetheart deals that allow them to coast by without having to compete fairly based off their actual costs (OpenAI loses money on every request it serves). That allow AI datacenters to continuously violate local laws. That allow the datacenters to pollute their local water table. Go after the management enacting requirements that their subordinates demonstrate how AI is improving their work efficiency on pain of firing. You get the picture.

And sure, call out individuals. But please don't label us all as a group on this.


EDIT: old man intensifies. And another thing! (to support my point that the corps need to be the target in these discussions):

Companies like Microsoft are resorting to forcing AI features into their products and defaulting those AI features to ON in order to get the user numbers they need to keep justifying the absurd expenditure on AI, and to be able to keep pushing the false narrative into the media of everyone using AI.

These effectively fabricated increases in user numbers from these features being default on means that the impact of individual programmers and devs deciding to use or not use AI are not going to move the needle significantly enough to make a difference.

I'm proud to say that currently my workplace has all this shit disabled on an enterprise level, and firewall blocks preventing using any of it. Unfortunately that will only last as long as it takes for the suits to come up with a sufficiently paranoid acceptable use policy. We're doing what we can to keep stoking the idea that putting any info into these things is effectively selling it to potential competitors, but that can only go so far against Gartner and the like whispering in the C-suite's ear.

Anyway. Everyone has a duty to say no to this shit, but all the companies are already using every dirty trick they can to boost the user numbers. If you're running around under the impression that the absurd user numbers represent true users, and that those users must be comprised entirely of tech workers because artists never would use AI, then you're looking at a false narrative being pushed by the people who stand to make the most money off this shit. The user numbers are not accurate to begin with.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

FYI: You can't combine a URL post and an image post. It's one or the other and the Lemmy UI doesn't make that limitation clear. The standard workaround is what you've done, put the URL in the body text.

More on topic: I can't imagine using an AI for anything even remotely resembling childcare advice.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

votes were reasonably more private back then.

Not commenting on anything else in your comment except to say: Votes have never been private on Lemmy. The have been made more visible, but they were always just an API call away.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

No, you're expected to block communities you aren't interested in. Curate your feed/all.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You said "banned you from the whole instance", which isn't something a moderator can do. Only admins can do instance wide bans, moderators are limited to bans from their own comms.

It wasn't unreasonable to think you were mixing up moderator and admin. Plenty of people did during the first reddit exodus, and still do.

Good old Jonathan Coulton. Guy who did the closing songs for Portal and Portal 2.

Everyone has to portray themeselves within the bounds of "corporately acceptable" for so much of their fucking time that it becomes easier to just stop context switching and let those parts of yourself atrophy.

 

Crossposting from lemm.ee's technology community

PDF of the study

Hahahahaha. At least they had the balls to publish and host it themselves.

 

Love this inversion of the song trope of lamenting the loss of nature. It's a satirical lament of the loss of corporate development.

Lyrics:

Here we stand

Like an Adam and an Eve

Waterfalls

The Garden of Eden

Two fools in love

So beautiful and strong

The birds in the trees

Are smiling upon them

From the age of the dinosaurs

Cars have run on gasoline

Where, where have they gone?

Now, it's nothing but flowers

There was a factory

Now, there are mountains and rivers

You got it, you got it

We caught a rattlesnake

Now, we got something for dinner

We got it, we got it

There was a shopping mall

Now, it's all covered with flowers

You've got it, you've got it

If this is paradise

I wish I had a lawnmower

You've got it, you've got it

Years ago

I was an angry young man

I'd pretend

That I was a billboard

Standing tall

By the side of the road

I fell in love

With a beautiful highway

This used to be real estate

Now, it's only fields and trees

Where, where is the town?

Now, it's nothing but flowers

The highways and cars

Were sacrificed for agriculture

I thought that we'd start over

But I guess I was wrong, hey

Once there were parking lots

Now, it's a peaceful oasis

You got it, you got it

This was a Pizza Hut

Now, it's all covered with daisies

You got it, you got it

I miss the honky tonks

Dairy Queens and Seven-Elevens

You got it, you got it

And as things fell apart

Nobody paid much attention

You got it, you got it

I dream of cherry pies

Candy bars and chocolate chip cookies

You got it, you got it

We used to microwave

Now, we just eat nuts and berries

You got it, you got it

This was a discount store

Now, it's turned into a cornfield

You got it, you got it

Don't leave me stranded here

I can't get used to this lifestyle

 

US Congress proposed bill to allow AI to prescribe drugs and medical treatment

Original post from the Fuck AI community: https://lemmy.world/post/24681591

The fact that this has even been proposed is horrifying on so many fucking levels. Technically it has to be approved by the state invovled and the FDA, but opening this door even a crack is so absurdly out of touch with reality.

 
 

What's your favorite pronoun candy?

 

I always get a kick out of goofy ass edits of right wing, facebook tier "memes"

 
 
 

So I'm coming back to the game after a two year break. I didn't get too deep into the game before, mostly doing low level combat and trading.

I was wondering what resources people more familiar with the game would suggest I check out for getting into some of the other content like mining, exobiology, and exploration. I'd like to take a shot at the basics of the different gameplay loops/styles before I start trying to get into the deeper content like engineering.

Unfortunately a lot of guides I've found seem to focus on maximum optimization before you even try to get into the content. I don't want to do an engineering grind, or grind to get an FC, before I figure out if I even like the type of gameplay it's going to make easier.

 

We've heard the anguished screams of the Funhole community for an alternative to the Funhole Times. For a hard hitting publication unafraid to dig deep, unrestrained by concepts like "common sense", "integrity", "anti-treason laws", "libel lawsuits", and "basic measures of competence".

We're proud to bring you a snippet of the inaugural issue of the Funhole Gazette, and we hope some competition will drive us all to make even better content in the new year!

We also vigorously deny any allegations of sabotage of the Funhole Times facilities.

 

New Ed! Not much particularly new info, just a general lament and summary of the state of tech and how much has been pinned on magical thinking. Has some wonderfully quotable sections.

What if what we're seeing today isn't a glimpse of the future, but the new terms of the present? What if artificial intelligence isn't actually capable of doing much more than what we're seeing today, and what if there's no clear timeline when it'll be able to do more? What if this entire hype cycle has been built, goosed by a compliant media ready and willing to take career-embellishers at their word?

Please forgive my addition to the title, as it's meant to be a play on "Waiting for Godot", not a comment on the Godot game engine. Wanted to make that more clear than the title alone would.

view more: ‹ prev next ›