Especially also when you're using them to be facetious.
He's "talented".
He's "talented."
Especially also when you're using them to be facetious.
He's "talented".
He's "talented."
I only have option 2, and would like option 1. But I can still open varying amounts, depending if it's extra windy or not. The slide bar had adjustable tension.
You might want to read a book
It's a smoker, with a port for a temp probe in the meat.
When you smoke something for 10-12 hours it's nice to get temp readings from wherever. It might also have automatic control for temperature management.
Came across this post today. https://bsky.app/profile/kojamf.bsky.social/post/3ltav35egbs2q
How would you classify this? I know it to be fake, but its created to make a point. But its good enough that someone could be fooled intl believing it was real, no?
There are rules for when sentencing occurs concurrently or consecutively. Additionally the prosecution should want the most charges possible, in the event that an appeal overturns (or orders a new trial on) only a few of the indicted charges.
Imagine a primary with AOC, Pete Buttegieg, and maybe a third younger candidate....
All could be really exciting to see advance, but they'll split the vote and open the way for some stupid fucking corpse to win.
I hate this system.
More specifically, you pay tax first to the country where the income was generated, and are usually tax liable to the country you are resident in.
Typically taxation treaties prevent double taxation, but the net result is you will usually get hit with the equivalent of the highest tax across jurisdictions.
I hear you, but this is subjective and not objective. A bad faith actor, presumably an authoritarian government, can exploit laws like this to advance their agenda. "Yes, I was definitely convinced that was George HW Bush".
Subjective judgements are ripe for abuse of power, sadly.
Good things phones all work with Galieleo
It's a slippery slope from something that is otherwise well intentioned.
Define what a deep fake is over a parody or other political commentary.
The right to gleefully split infinitives.