yetAnotherUser

Das hätte ein maschineller PDF-Leser hingekriegt - und wäre dabei sogar noch schneller als der Prof gewesen!

Ich die ersten Wochen in der Analysis-Vorlesung...

...bis ich bemerkt hab, dass der Prof nur das Skript vorliest und wortwörtlich an die Tafel klatscht.

There's literally no need to create a whole taxonomy for the small physical differences in human ethnicities. May as well classify these bunnies into different [whatever] due to fur color.

War neugierig, hier das Bild für alle interessierte:

Ganz eventuell NSFA

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Intertrigo.jpg

I'll take the 80% treats for the 20% effect, please.

Quoting, parodies etc. is explicitly regulated and very tightly regulated. I can only speak for Germany here, other EU countries have different laws but I know they tend to be on the strict side as well.

For example, parodies must explicitly comment on the original work to be permitted. Modifying the lyrics in a funny way alone is not enough to be a parody.

Same with quotes: They are only permitted if they serve a scientific, informative or analytical purpose. Quotes for illustration purposes or entertainment are explicitly not permitted.

In 2021, "pastiches" were legalized which allows for some entertainment use of derivative copyrighted works but there is no legal precedent yet that defines their scope.

Fair use is a US-only concept. Western EU countries tend to have much stricter copyright laws.

Ah yes, Bundesdepublik Reutschland

Balls objectively suck, way too sensitive things. Also testicular torsion is a thing.

But urinary tract infection prevention tubes are fucking awesome! Like I've heard women (or unpenised individuals more broadly speaking) can get them from sitting on a cold surface for too long??? That's so awful, I'd be WAY too unfit to stand around an hour for my delayed train in winter.

I didn't watch the video but the answer should just be yes? Literally just create a new law that punishes online deepfake sex crimes.

Sample wording:

(1) Whoever publishes realistic manipulated sexual content involving the likeness of a concrete person against their consent will face a punishment of up to 2 years in prison.
(2) In case the offender intended to cause distress or publicly humiliate the victim, the punishment will be between 6 months and 4 years.

That's pretty much it. Maybe adjust the punishments a little but they feel reasonable to me.

Aren't all gloves unisex? What would even be the difference? I guess size but that feels a bit artificial considering there is a lot of overlap.

To be fair, that's a stupid claim here:

pushing unregulated vitamin K drops that doctors warn babies can’t absorb well

The drops are less effective than the drops but both are still in the same order of magnitude, that is, reducing the risk to below 1/100,000. Not perfect but far from "can't absorb well". They are the standard in some countries.

From a public health perspective, doctors should just offer these (but now regulated) drops when parents decline the more effective injection. It's significantly better than leaving it up to the parents to YOLO it and potentially under- or overdose it or not do it at all.