Not at all, but neither does OPs request hahahah. There are more hard core leveling devices if a cheap bubble level isn't good enough.
zoloftt
I see what you're saying. Make the bubble offset "evenly", but then you're doing Kentucky windage with your bubble everytime?
I think this becomes entirely moot if you mark which side of your level is the "accurate" side. I have a torpedo level that's damaged on one side, but I like that it has magnets, so I explicitly use the magnet side which I know is accurate.
That assumes that it's the bubble tube that's not installed evenly but doesn't remove the problem the other person suggested, which is a non-flat or non-squared other side?
They aren't. Not sure what news you're getting. National guard is putzing around. ICEstappo and the other LEO feds are. You have shown you'd rather be a keyboard revolutionary than actually understand. I hope you're not from the USA, because your lack of interest in understanding the actual problem is no better than a MAGAt.
I don't know if you're still checking this, but you WANT the people who question these things to stay in. The other guy already tried his best to explain it to you so I won't dog pile.
As I said before, semantics. I'm on your side. I agree that the Dems are hardly any better than the GOP. The 2 party system is trash, and we need actual progress instead of folks just keeping things the way they are.
Care to expand? Maybe read Rules For Radicals and you can tell me why I'm wrong.
That is semantics friend. You're describing semantics. We disagree on the meaning of a word, because colloquially it means one thing while it means something else in other definitions.
Also your analogy is bad. You're describing a generalization or the formation of a stereotype.
Correcting language IS NOT how you correct ideas. You correct ideas by making people experience a difference in emotion.
Agreed. People are trying so hard to be correct that they don't want to be on the same side, they'd rather pick a flight.
Still missing my point. I agree with your stance wholeheartedly. It's a semantics problem. The point of communication is to get an idea across, and you're hard stuck on this pictures usage of the word liberal.
I don't know if you're not from the US, but I am, and what I've described is how that word is interpreted in the US.
Looks like my comment went over your head. You are exactly what I'm talking about.
I understand your point, but it's pedantic either way.
You may not know this yet, but this guy is the attorney representing Jonathan Ross... And has made a statement that he still supports Trump...