234
Nearly Half of Congress’ Top Staffers Want to Quit
(www.thedailybeast.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
234 points (98.3% liked)
politics
19145 readers
4637 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The article says it's not split along party lines.
Honestly, I get it. Dysfunction and corruption in politics has produced a generation of congresspeople who are self-selected for being obstructive corrupt assholes, and dysfunction in media has produced an electorate that's too poorly informed to be able to tackle the (substantial) task of identifying and removing the bums and installing instead people who would be at least passably interested in forming a part of a functioning government.
My guess is that the staffers, in contrast to the a lot of the politicians, are pretty interested in being part of a functioning government. Even if the person you work for is interested in progress, that means more or less nothing if the rest of the system isn't on board, which currently it isn't. It must be frustrating as hell going in to work every day and watching everyone important in your organization just strutting around telling racist jokes and smearing shit on the walls, and then you have to clean it all up and try to turn it into something useful.
(This is by the way one tactic in the process of fascism taking control. Clog up the works of legitimate government to lend a tissue of credibility to your claim "well the whole thing doesn't work, it's better if we push it aside and I just run everything instead.")
You're right and I hate it. I'm genuinely concerned about what happens in January 2025. Either Biden fumbles reelection and we have a fascist dictator in power or Biden wins in November and we probably see another coup attempt. If it's the latter, I wouldn't want to be working in the Capitol that day. If it's the former, I'm not convinced that there wouldn't be public executions of dissenting party supporters. I know trump is just a symptom of a much bigger issue, but him being alive and free in the short term is a threat to national security. I don't say this as a call to action or anything, but as a matter of fact. The American experiment may come to an end within the next year just because a fat, stupid, spoiled, greedy asshole has convinced enough stupid assholes to literally risk their lives to give him everything he could ever want. If we get out of this whole, we drastically need education reform to prevent 1/3 of the country from getting hoodwinked by the next grifter. Until then, I'm praying for that dipshit's 6th amendment right to a speedy trial. Or that his terrible diet finally takes effect. If there were a god worth worshipping, trump's diet wouldn't have allowed him to live beyond the national average in the first place, but here we are, shameless apes on a godless rock.
I think signing up as an election worker is probably a pretty good way to help. I think some shit's gonna go down, yes, and that's one small way to put yourself in a position to be there when it does, instead of just leaving the country in "Jesus take the wheel hope it turns out ok" mode.
(And also yes, improving education and news media would be 2 huge steps for fixing it longer term)
In addition to what you said, I suspect that even the politicians that aren't obstructive and corrupt are still assholes. It takes a certain personality to want to go into politics, and a certain amount of ego to think you should be running things, even the nice ones are likely a bit overinflated. And, from what I've heard, at least some of them aren't paid that well. There's also the allegations of Klobuchar throwing things at her staff, what kind of abuse are they dealing with behind closed doors - what's the process if they are being abused by the politician they work for?
I think it varies by the politician. I've spoken with people who worked in politics who really looked up to the people they worked for as people trying to make a positive difference in the world (sometimes even succeeding), and I've spoken with people who said the people they worked for were just the absolute worst people you can possibly imagine on a personal level. Just like 10 times worse than you think, making your skin crawl to even have to interact with them.