325

U.S., Not Israel, Shot Down Most Iran Drones and Missiles (theintercept.com)

submitted 8 months ago by Linkerbaan@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

133 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The United States shot down more drones and missiles than Israel did on Saturday night during Iran’s attack, The Intercept can report.

More than half of Iran’s weapons were destroyed by U.S. aircraft and missiles before they ever reached Israel. In fact, by commanding a multinational air defense operation and scrambling American fighter jets, this was a U.S. military triumph.

The extent of the U.S. military operation is unbeknownst to the American public, but the Pentagon coordinated a multination, regionwide defense extending from northern Iraq to the southern Persian Gulf on Saturday. During the operation, the U.S., U.K., France, and Jordan all shot down the majority of Iranian drones and missiles. In fact, where U.S. aircraft originated from has not been officially announced, an omission that has been repeated by the mainstream media. Additionally, the role of Saudi Arabia is unclear, both as a base for the United States and in terms of any actions by the Saudi military.

“U.S. intelligence estimates that half of the weapons fired by Iran failed upon launch or in flight due to technical issues,” a U.S. Air Force senior officer told The Intercept. Of the remaining 160 or so, the U.S. shot down the majority, the officer said. The officer was granted anonymity to speak about sensitive operational matters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works -5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yet they’re funding the democrats more than the republicans.

They get everything they want with Biden and the Dems, no one has stopped them.

With Trump they get a man who cohorts with neonazis, and they may get literal WW3 or a flakey ally.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Trump pushed US policy much closer to Israel. Biden has been mostly status quo, though leaning away from them which the US has never done before. I need a citation on funding to believe that claim, but regardless they already have republicans in their pocket. They don't need to spend any more to purchase them.

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

Is the US really leaning away from Israel though. They’re still actively funding and aiding them.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68173904.amp - "US sanctions Israeli settlers over West Bank violence"

https://time.com/6591139/biden-israel-executive-order-sanctions/ - "What to Make of Biden’s Historic Sanctions on Israeli Settlers"

https://www.voanews.com/amp/calls-increase-for-israeli-accounting-for-gaza-airstrike/7556362.html

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/4/10/biden-israels-netanyahu-making-mistake-on-gaza

https://www.politico.eu/article/israels-netanyahu-says-he-will-defy-bidens-red-line-and-invade-rafah/

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/03/22/biden-netanyahu-friendship-pressure-campaign-00148328

https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/20240404-%F0%9F%94%B4live-israel-accused-of-targeting-gaza-aid-convoy-car-by-car -

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

Man, thanks for listing the sources. I didn't want to do the work. Yet, you got downvoted for it because they don't actually want to know the truth. They want to spread a lie.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago

Leaning away as in away from our usual stance? Hell yeah. We historically wouldn't even criticize them.

[-] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago

The first time ever? Why do liberals constantly lie and exaggerate? No one with a brain believes you. Obama leaned away from Israel by actually blowing them off, Biden scolding Netanyahu a couple times while proceeding to give him billions in aid isn’t leaning away from shit.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

Obama I think criticized them, but I don't think there was ever any action behind it. I could be wrong about this but I think that's the case. That said, Obama never faced a situation like this. He would probably handle it I a way I more agree with, but he's not president so it doesn't really matter.

[-] lemmylem@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

There weren't any major wars when Trump was in office.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

It was a small 4 year period where most of the world was battling Covid and increasing death rates at home.

[-] lemmylem@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

U right.

[-] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The best part of the “Genocide Joe” cohort is they call him that - despite the fact that he hasn’t committed a genocide - while simultaneously virulently denying the very real and well-documented genocides committed by communist Russia and China.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Pretty sure I've called them out multiple times.

[+] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee -7 points 8 months ago

Ah so despite the fact that you seem to be aware of what an actual genocide is you decide to call Biden that…why, exactly? Because it sounds clever? Because you along with 90% of the rest of the world allowed Donald Trump to lead you down to the level of grown ass adults referring to literally fucking everybody by childish, idiotic nicknames?

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Ah so you deny there is a genocide in Palestine.

Disgusting.

[-] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don’t deny there’s a genocide I just have a fucking brain in my skull and am capable of recognizing that Biden isn’t the person responsible for it because I don’t have my opinions spoon-fed to me by Russian bot-farms lol.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Hey if a person goes and murders a bunch of people, and I give him guns wnd money and keep giving him them as he’s still actively murdering people, while also telling everyone else ”If you do anything about this, I will protect him” - would you not say I’m somewhat culpable?

[-] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee -3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I’m sorry I didn’t realize Joe Biden was in full control of Congress - you know, the part of the government that fucking sets the budget and allocates spending. Do you think he is some kind of dictator? Cuz it sounds like that’s what you expect him to be.

There are fucking Schoolhouse Rock videos that display a more nuanced understanding of how the US government works than you do.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Joe Biden literally bypassed congress twice to give weapons to Israel.

Joe Bidens self appointed foreign secretary defends Israel from retaliation.

Joe Biden as commander in chief shields Israel from retaliation.

Joe Biden uses his own words to say he supports Israel.

Joe Biden uses his government and his position to enable Israel, end of fucking story.

You don’t get to hand wash away his direct and applicable support of Israel and pretend the PotUS is a completely powerless position unable to do anything.

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024

325 points (93.3% liked)

World News

39276 readers

1667 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.