811
submitted 7 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 91 points 7 months ago

Threatening him does nothing but make the judge look like a chickenshit same as the rest

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

"The last thing I want to do is put you in jail."

~ Judge Juan Merchan

We love our fair and impartial judiciary, don't we folks? Lets give Judge Merchan a big hand. He's helping to Make America Great Again.

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago

I wonder if he means that in the sense of "putting you in jail is only going to empower your frankly rabid base of supporters. I need to avoid even the slightest hint of a mistrial so we can put you in prison for good."

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 months ago

I need to avoid even the slightest hint of a mistrial so we can put you in prison for good

I mean I'm pretty sure that's it. There's no chance whatsoever this doesn't go to appeal if he's convicted, and you don't want the case to be overturned because the appeal court thinks the judge was biased against Trump

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago

putting you in jail is only going to empower your frankly rabid base of supporters

What does the judge think will happen should the jury returns a guilty verdict?

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

A jury of people selected (partly) by his own lawyers convicting him should be a lot easier of a pill to swallow for his base than a "Democrat" judge unilaterally deciding, on his own, to detain trump.

key word here is "should"

Honestly while Trumps legal team have been complaining about not being able to get a fair trial, that works both ways. I'm worried about enough MAGAts making their way onto the jury to nullify

[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Then the jury will be targeted instead of the judge, so he'd prefer that.

He knows that the rabid Republicans will try to twist it to say that he was jailed to prevent him from attending his own hearing. When they would gladly teleconference him in from the cell, like they do with other criminals. But that's not good enough for Donald Duck. Either this Jack-o'-lantern gets to sit there and look pretty or he will scream and cry a fit until election day comes around and it's too late.

It's all part of the nut factory's plan.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Contempt charges are usually held in a cell in the courthouse, and they just parade you out for your trial and then put you back in the cell when it's over. He'll be able to do literally nothing but attend his own trial.

But if he starts acting out once they have him in cuffs, screaming about how his special mister person privileges are being violated, won't they be putting him back in the cell?

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago
this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
811 points (98.2% liked)

News

23625 readers
3153 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS